edgarwiki

Non-GAAP measures

67 staff comments in this corpus, to 34 registrants, filed 2023-01-03 to 2025-12-08.

Corpus in progress. This is an early build. It does not yet cover every comment letter the SEC has published, so counts here are counts within this corpus and must not be read as complete SEC-wide totals. Every quotation is verbatim and links to its filing; what is incomplete is coverage, not accuracy. See Methodology.
MeasureValue
Comments raising this issue67
Share of all 4,297 comments in the corpus1.6%
Distinct registrants34
With a recorded company response67

The exchanges

Verbatim, most recent first. Quotations are exact spans from the filing linked beneath each one; long passages are truncated with an ellipsis and never altered.

SEC staff comment
4. Please address the following as they relate to adjusted diluted net loss per share in prior comment 4: • Confirm that you will disclose prior year comparative information; • Confirm that you will disclose, at a similar level as you provided in your response letter dated September 18, 2025, the reasons why management believes that adjusting for income/loss relating to equity method securities and the gain/loss on debt securities carried at fair value in arriving at adjusted diluted net loss per share provides useful information to investors; and • Confirm that you will present the income tax effect separately from other non-GAAP adjustments as it does not appear that you have done so in your September 30, 2025 earnings release. Company
The company responded
We respectfully acknowledge the Staff’s comment. • Confirm that you will disclose prior year comparative information; We confirm that we have provided prior year comparative information related to adjusted diluted net loss per share for our most recently filed earnings release for the period ended September 30, 2025, furnished with the Commission on October 27, 2025 under Item 2.02 of our Current Report on Form 8-K (the “ Q3 2025 Earnings Release ”), and will continue to do so in future filings. • Confirm that you will disclose, at a similar level as you provided in your response letter dated September 18, 2025, the reasons why management believes that adjusting for income/loss relating to equity method securities and the gain/loss on debt securities carried at fair value in arriving at adjusted diluted net loss per share provides useful information to investors; and We respectfully…
BED BATH & BEYOND, INC. · filed 2025-12-08 · 0001130713-25-000082
SEC staff comment
3. Staff’s comment : We note that your Adjusted EBITDA calculation removes "one-time separation costs." Please tell us and disclose in sufficient detail the nature of the items included within this adjustment. In addition, explain to us how these costs do not represent normal cash operating expenses necessary to operate your business. Refer to Question 100.01 of the Non-GAAP Financial Measures Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations.
The company responded
The Company acknowledges the Staff’s comment and we have added footnote (a) to the reconciliation table on page 71 of the Registration Statement. We have included the footnote below for your ease of reference. “(a) Primarily comprised of one-time expenses for consulting services in connection with establishing Atmus as a stand-alone public company: Information Technology $ 5.0 Human Resources 2.3 All Other 1.7 $ 9.0 ” The Company believes that these adjustments do not result in a non-GAAP measure that is misleading because items described as “one-time separation costs” are costs that are needed to establish Atmus as a stand-alone public company, but will not be recurring costs to operate the business. Consulting services received for establishing benefit plans and information technology system solutions are two of the largest costs. These costs are not considered normal cash operating…
Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc. · filed 2023-03-31 · 0001104659-23-040204
SEC staff comment
2. We note the revisions made in response to prior comment two to the non-GAAP measure on page 75, now identified as discretionary cash flow, and the disclosures you have on page 69, regarding maintenance and growth capital expenditures. As it relates to these disclosures, please address the following: • Disclosure on page 69 explains that maintenance capital expenditures increased in 2022 versus 2021 as a result of scheduled unit overhauls based on the age and operating hours of such units. You also disclose that the amount of maintenance capital expenditures are predictable. Tell us how the amounts of maintenance capital expenditures incurred in 2021 and 2022 compare to your expected level of such expenditures over future operating periods on an average basis.
The company responded
We respectfully acknowledge the Staff’s comment and advise the Staff that, as of the date hereof, the Company expects to incur maintenance capital expenditures of $39.6 million and $40.6 million in 2023 and 2024, respectively. On an average basis (i.e. $40.1 million), such amounts represent a decrease of 5.2% compared to 2021 and a decrease of 17.0% compared to 2022. The decrease in maintenance capital expenditures in 2023 and 2024 relative to 2022 is due to a significant increase in fleet size that occurred in 2018 and 2014 that had reached their scheduled maintenance interval, which occurs every four years. • Disclosure on page 75 indicates that the combined amount of maintenance and growth capital expenditures was $245.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2022. Please reconcile this amount to the line item ‘Purchase of capital assets’ reported on the statement of cash flows of…
Kodiak Gas Services, Inc. · filed 2023-03-31 · 0001193125-23-088327
SEC staff comment
1. We note your response to comment 1 indicates that your "use of the 'primary working capital' metric is more appropriately categorized as a key performance indicator (KPI)." It is our understanding that primary working capital is a non-GAAP measure and, therefore, it needs to comply with applicable rules that generally prohibit excluding charges or liabilities that required or will require cash settlement from non-GAAP liquidity measures. Accordingly, please revise future filings to ensure the measure complies with Item 10(e)(1)(ii)(A) of Regulation S-K.
The company responded
We have reviewed Item 10(e)(1)(ii)(A) of Regulation SK. We believe Working Capital is a GAAP term intended to convey the short-term liquidity of a company and is not the same as “Primary Operating Capital” (POC). Working Capital is calculated by subtracting current liabilities from current assets. Positive Working Capital generally indicates that a company can fund its current operations and other priorities such as future growth. Working Capital is fundamentally different than the Company’s POC Key Performance Indicator (KPI) that is used by the Company to measure asset intensity rather than liquidity. The POC KPI metric is defined as the level of POC, and its ratio to net sales. The Company defines POC as accounts receivable, plus inventories, minus accounts payable. The resulting net amount is divided by the trailing three-month net sales (annualized) to derive a POC percentage. We…
EnerSys · filed 2023-03-30 · 0001289308-23-000017
SEC staff comment
11. We continue to believe that your adjustment to exclude mine development costs is inconsistent with the guidance in Question 100.01 of the Non-GAAP Financial Measures Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations. Please confirm to us that you will no longer include the adjustment in any non-GAAP financial measures and revise to present your measure in accordance with Item 10(e) of Regulation S-X and Regulation G.
The company responded
We agree with the comment and have revised our filing accordingly. Additionally, we have submitted a draft of the 2022 earnings 8-K for review. Regards, Kirk P. Taylor, CPA Chief Financial Officer American Resources Corp UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 FORM 8-K CURRENT REPORT Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Date of Report (Date of Earliest event Reported): March 30, 2023 AMERICAN RESOURCES CORPORATION (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Florida 000-55456 46-3914127 (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation) (Commission File Number) (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) 12115 Visionary Way, Suite 174, Fishers Indiana, 46038 (Address of principal executive offices) (317) 855-9926 (Registrant’s telephone number, including area code) ________________________________________________ (Former…
American Resources Corp · filed 2023-03-29 · 0001654954-23-003837
SEC staff comment
11. We continue to believe that your adjustment to exclude mine development costs is inconsistent with the guidance in Question 100.01 of the Non-GAAP Financial Measures Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations. Please confirm to us that you will no longer include the adjustment in any non-GAAP financial measures and revise to present your measure in accordance with Item 10(e) of Regulation S-X and Regulation G.
The company responded
We agree with the comment and have revised our filing accordingly. Additionally, we have submitted a draft of the 2022 earnings 8-K for review. Regards, Kirk P. Taylor, CPA Chief Financial Officer American Resources Corp
American Resources Corp · filed 2023-03-23 · 0001654954-23-003447
SEC staff comment
Comment 1 : Cash flows from operations before changes in operating assets and liabilities appears to represent a non-GAAP measure. Please remove this measure from your filings or provide the disclosures required by Item 10(e) of Regulation S-K.
The company responded
We will remove from future filings the table of cash flows from operating activities included in Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, Liquidity and Capital Resources, Discussion of Operating, Investing, Financing Cash Flows which includes the presentation of cash flows from operations before changes in operating assets and liabilities. We will revise our disclosures in Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, Liquidity and Capital Resources, Discussion of Operating, Investing, Financing Cash Flows in future filings to discuss cash flows from operating activities as presented in our GAAP based consolidated statements of cash flows. Consolidated Financial Statements Consolidated Balance Sheets, page F-4
LIONS GATE ENTERTAINMENT CORP /CN/ · filed 2023-03-23 · 0000929351-23-000012
SEC staff comment
Comment 7 : Please tell us how you determined that your removal of the effects of purchase accounting and related adjustments from your non-GAAP measures, such as Adjusted OIBDA and Adjusted Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Lions Gate Entertainment Corp. Shareholders, does not substitute individually-tailored recognition and measurement methods from GAAP. Refer to Question 100.4 of the Non-GAAP Financial Measures Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations.
The company responded
We considered Question 100.4 of the Non-GAAP Financial Measures Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations, which is presented below: "Question 100.04 Question: Can a non-GAAP measure violate Rule 100(b) of Regulation G if the recognition and measurement principles used to calculate the measure are inconsistent with GAAP? Answer: Yes. By definition, a non-GAAP measure excludes or includes amounts from the most directly comparable GAAP measure. However, non-GAAP adjustments that have the effect of changing the recognition and measurement principles required to be applied in accordance with GAAP would be considered individually tailored and may cause the presentation of a non-GAAP measure to be misleading. Examples the staff may consider to be misleading include, but are not limited to: • changing the pattern of recognition, such as including an adjustment in a non-GAAP performance measure…
LIONS GATE ENTERTAINMENT CORP /CN/ · filed 2023-03-23 · 0000929351-23-000012
SEC staff comment
Comment 9 : Please expand your description of the adjustments for net increase or decrease in production and related loans and your production tax credit facility on page 12 to further clarify the nature of these adjustments. Please also provide a reconciliation of these non-GAAP adjustment amounts to the changes in the related balance sheet amounts and your statement of cash flows for the same reporting period.
The company responded
In future filings, in our Use of Non-GAAP Measures disclosures, we will expand our description of the adjustments for net increase or decrease in production and related loans and our production tax credit facility to further clarify the nature of these adjustments. Specifically, we will clarify that the cost of producing films and television programs, which is reflected as a reduction of the GAAP based cash flows provided by (used in) operating activities, is often financed through production loans. The adjustment for production and related loans is made in order to better align the timing of the cash flows associated with producing films and television programs with the timing of the repayment of the production loans, which is consistent with how management views its production cash spend and manages the Company's cash flows and working capital needs. Borrowings on production loans…
LIONS GATE ENTERTAINMENT CORP /CN/ · filed 2023-03-23 · 0000929351-23-000012
SEC staff comment
2. We note that you present non-GAAP gross profit, net income (loss), and diluted net income (loss) per share that exclude warrant contra revenues. Considering these amounts are directly related to revenue generating activities with customers, please remove these adjustments from all non-GAAP measures. See Question 100.04 of the Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations on Non-GAAP Financial Measures.
The company responded
The Company acknowledges the Staff’s comment and will remove warrant contra revenue adjustments from its non-GAAP measures in future financial releases and future filings with the Commission. ***** In connection with our response to the Staff's comments, we acknowledge that the Company and its management are responsible for the accuracy and adequacy of its disclosures, notwithstanding any review, comments, action or absence of action by the Staff. Should you have any questions or comments with respect to the above, or believe that a call would be helpful, please do not hesitate to contact me at (415) 377-6101. Sincerely, /s/ Daniel Fleming Name: Daniel Fleming Title: Chief Financial Officer
Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd · filed 2023-03-20 · 0000950103-23-004399
SEC staff comment
2. We note your adjustment for other expenses included in your non-GAAP measures tables. Please further explain each adjustment for us and tell us how you determined that the items included in other expenses are short term and clearly separable and direct results of COVID-19 and were incremental to charges incurred related to COVID-19 but not expected to recur once the pandemic has subsided. In this regard, please explain how you considered other factors that may have impacted the excess shipping costs and project charges, such as increase in oil prices and persistent price inflation, in your assessment. Refer to CF Disclosure Topic 9 for the use of COVID-19 related adjustments to determine non-GAAP financial measures and item 10(e)(1)(ii) of Regulation S-K. Company
The company responded
The Company respectfully acknowledges the Staff’s comment and submits that, based on Item 10 of Regulation S-K and the relevant Staff guidance, the adjustments to its non-GAAP metrics for “Other Expenses” are directly attributable to the COVID-19 pandemic and are non-recurring, incremental to normal operations and based on actual amounts. The Company views the COVID-19 pandemic as a once in a lifetime occurrence that is not reasonably likely to recur. Therefore, the Company concluded for the period from Q3 2021 to Q3 2022, it was appropriate to exclude only items that were directly attributable to COVID-19 and were: • Incremental to charges incurred prior to COVID-19; • Not expected to recur once the pandemic subsides; and • Clearly separable from normal operations The Company determined that the adjustments for the excess shipping costs and project charges are incremental to normal…
Fluence Energy, Inc. · filed 2023-03-16 · 0001104659-23-033329
SEC staff comment
1. We note that you present net revenue for certain of your segments, which excludes freight and delivery costs billed to customers. This appears to be a non-GAAP measure that would be considered individually tailored and have the effect of changing the recognition and measurement principles applied in accordance with GAAP. Please explain to us how you considered Question 100.04 of the Non-GAAP Financial Measures Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations. Division of Corporate Finance Securities and Exchange Commission March 15, 2023 Page 2 Company
The company responded
In the tables summarizing the results of operations of certain of its segments, the Company has historically included a line item labeled net revenue, which represents the mathematical result of subtracting freight and delivery costs from gross revenue, as reported. The intent of this presentation has not been to change the recognition and measurement principles applied in accordance with GAAP or to substitute an individually tailored non-GAAP measure for the appropriate GAAP measure. In fact, our presentation has always shown the appropriate GAAP measure in a line item appearing above net revenue. Moreover, the narrative discussion of segment results that follows the tables has focused solely on the GAAP measure, and has not mentioned or discussed changes in net revenue or the reasons for the same. We believe this information is helpful in understanding the nature of our sales…
EAGLE MATERIALS INC · filed 2023-03-15 · 0001193125-23-071383
SEC staff comment
1. Please present the most directly comparable GAAP measure to the non-GAAP measure “ongoing free cash flow conversion”. Refer to footnote 27 of the SEC Final Rule Release Number 33-8176. Additionally, disclose why management believes the presentation of this measure provides useful information to investors, and to the extent material, disclose the additional purposes, if any, for which management uses the measure. Refer to Item 10e(1)(i) of Regulation S-K. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission March 10, 2023 Page 2
The company responded
Ashland’s use of non-GAAP measures were disclosed on pages M-12 and M-13 within the Form 10-K for Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2022 and the reconciliations for free cash flow and other liquidity resource disclosures were on pages M-27 and M-28. Within those disclosures, Ashland has provided a quantitative reconciliation for both “Adjusted EBITDA” and “Ongoing free cash flow”. “Ongoing free cash flow conversion” is the percentage derived from “Ongoing free cash flow” divided by “Adjusted EBITDA”. In response to the Staff’s comment, Ashland will provide the supplemental disclosures as illustrated below. We will also enhance our disclosures for why management believes the presentation of “ongoing free cash flow conversion” provides useful information to investors. The additional disclosure presentation changes have been bolded and underlined for ease of reference. Ashland will begin…
ASHLAND INC. · filed 2023-03-10 · 0000950170-23-007150
SEC staff comment
1. We note your tabular presentations include numerous amounts; however, it is not clear if or how the amounts presented reconcile to consolidated amounts. In this regard, please address the following in future filings: • Clarify and explain if or how the separate segment operating income (loss) amounts reconcile to consolidated operating income (loss) amounts; • Clarify and explain if or how the separate segment income (loss) from unconsolidated investments amounts reconcile to consolidated income (loss) from unconsolidated investments amounts; and • Clarify or explain why the amounts identified as Canopy equity earnings (losses) appear to represent comparable non-GAAP amounts rather than reported GAAP amounts. 207 High Point Drive, Building 100, Victor, NY 14564 Please enjoy our products responsibly. © 2020 Constellation Brands Inc., Victor, NY United States Securities and Exchange…
The company responded
The Company acknowledges the Staff’s comment. In response to the first bullet, the Company respectfully advises the Staff that consolidated operating income (loss) amounts in the Filing are calculated as (i) Beer Segment operating income (loss), plus (ii) Wine and Spirits Segment operating income (loss), plus (iii) Corporate Operations and Other Segment operating income (loss), minus (iv) Comparable Adjustments to Consolidated operating income (loss). In response to the second bullet, the Company respectfully advises the Staff that consolidated income (loss) from unconsolidated investment amounts in the Filing are calculated as (i) Wine and Spirits Segment income (loss) from unconsolidated investments, plus (ii) Corporate Operations and Other Segment income (loss) from unconsolidated investments, plus (iii) Canopy equity earnings (losses), minus (iv) Comparable Adjustments to…
CONSTELLATION BRANDS, INC. · filed 2023-03-09 · 0000016918-23-000020
SEC staff comment
2. We note you present a financial measure you identify as Consolidated EBIT; however, it appears the measure is adjusted for items you identify as comparable adjustments; does not represent Consolidated EBIT presented in your consolidated statements of operations; is the same as a measure you also identify as Comparable EBIT; and is not appropriately reconciled to the most directly comparable GAAP measure. Please explain how you determined the title of this measure and related presentation is appropriate based on the guidance in Questions 100.05, 103.01 and 103.02 of the Division of Corporation Finance’s Compliance & Disclosure Interpretations on Non-GAAP Financial Measures or tell us how you plan to revise the disclosures in future filings. Company
The company responded
The Company acknowledges the Staff’s comment. After considering the applicable guidance related to the use of non-GAAP financial measures set forth in Questions 100.05, 103.01, and 103.02 of the Division of Corporation Finance’s Compliance & Disclosure Interpretations on Non-GAAP Financial Measures, the Company respectfully advises the Staff that in future filings the Company will remove Consolidated EBIT from the tabular presentation of the renamed “Summarized Segment Information” section. United States Securities and Exchange Commission March 9, 2023 Page 3 The Company respectfully advises the Staff that EBIT (earnings before interest and taxes) is calculated as Net income (loss) attributable to CBI, excluding (i) Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests, (ii) Provision for (benefit from) income taxes, (iii) Loss on extinguishment of debt, and (iv) Interest expense.…
CONSTELLATION BRANDS, INC. · filed 2023-03-09 · 0000016918-23-000020
SEC staff comment
3. We note your reconciliations of GAAP to Non-GAAP Financial Measures presented on pages 13 and 15. We also note the format of the reconciliations remained unchanged in Earnings Releases you filed under Form 8-K in connection with your FY 2023 Form 10-Qs, including the Form 8-K you filed on January 5, 2023. It appears the reconciliations essentially represent non-GAAP income statements. Please explain to us how you determined the reconciliations are appropriate based on the revised guidance in Question 102.10 of the Division of Corporation Finance’s Compliance & Disclosure Interpretations on Non-GAAP Financial Measures or tell us how you plan to revise them in future filings. Company
The company responded
The Company acknowledges the Staff’s comment. After considering the applicable guidance related to the use of non-GAAP financial measures set forth in Question 102.10 of the Division of Corporation Finance’s Compliance & Disclosure Interpretations on Non-GAAP Financial Measures, the Company respectfully advises the Staff that in future filings the Company would anticipate using the proposed presentation in Appendix B attached hereto, as appropriate, subject to developments between the date hereof and the date of such future filings.
CONSTELLATION BRANDS, INC. · filed 2023-03-09 · 0000016918-23-000020
SEC staff comment
4. We note your disclosures related to comparable adjustments on pages 14 and 16; however, it is not clear your disclosures are appropriate and fully comply with the requirements of Item 10(e)(1)(i)(B) of Regulation S-K, which requires separate quantification and disclosure of each non-GAAP adjustment, or the guidance in Question 100.01 of the Division of Corporation Finance’s Compliance & Disclosure Interpretations on Non-GAAP Financial Measures, which prohibits adjustments related to normal operating expenses. Please explain to us why you believe the current adjustments and related presentation is appropriate or tell us how you plan to revise future filings. Company
The company responded
The Company acknowledges the Staff’s comment. After considering the applicable guidance related to the use of non-GAAP financial measures set forth in Item 10(e)(1)(i)(B) of Regulation S-K and Question 100.01 of the Division of Corporation Finance’s Compliance & Disclosure Interpretations on Non-GAAP Financial Measures, the Company respectfully advises the Staff that in future filings the Company would anticipate using the proposed presentation in Appendix C attached hereto, as appropriate, subject to developments between the date hereof and the date of such future filings. To provide further clarity regarding the nature of the comparable adjustments, the proposed presentation in Appendix C includes a separate line-item quantification and description of each comparable adjustment. In instances where it may not be apparent from the line-item description of a comparable adjustment, the…
CONSTELLATION BRANDS, INC. · filed 2023-03-09 · 0000016918-23-000020
SEC staff comment
5. We note you present certain non-GAAP financial measures in which you exclude the impact of Canopy, an equity method investment. Please explain to us how you determined the non-GAAP financial measures are appropriate based on the guidance in Question 100.04 of the Division of Corporation Finance’s Compliance & Disclosure Interpretations on Non-GAAP Financial Measures or tell us how you plan to revise them in future filings. Company
The company responded
The Company acknowledges the Staff’s comment and respectfully advises the Staff that the Company believes its presentation of certain non-GAAP financial measures in which the Company excludes the impact of Canopy, an equity method investment, complies with the applicable guidance related to the use of non-GAAP financial measures set forth in Question 100.04 of the Division of Corporation Finance’s Compliance & Disclosure Interpretations on Non-GAAP Financial Measures. The Company considered the following in determining that the exclusion of the impact of Canopy is not an individually tailored recognition and measurement method as described in Question 100.04 as it does not: (i) change the pattern of recognition, (ii) reflect parts, but not all, of an accounting concept, or (iii) change the basis of accounting. In addition, the exclusion of the impact of Canopy neither adds transactions…
CONSTELLATION BRANDS, INC. · filed 2023-03-09 · 0000016918-23-000020
SEC staff comment
1. In your press release you disclose the Non-GAAP measure “Adjusted EBITDA Margin”. Please revise to disclose the most comparable GAAP measure “Net Loss Margin” with equal or greater prominence in any future press releases. Refer to the guidance in Item 10(e)(1)(i)A of Regulation S-K, Regulation G and Question 102.10 of the Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations Regarding Non-GAAP Measures.
The company responded
The Company acknowledges the Staff’s comment and in future filings the Company will disclose the most comparable GAAP measure “Net Loss Margin” with equal or greater prominence to the Non-GAAP measure “Adjusted EBITDA Margin” and will provide a reconciliation of Net Loss Margin to Adjusted EBITDA margin.
Bowlero Corp. · filed 2023-03-03 · 0001628280-23-006272
SEC staff comment
2. In your press release, you disclose the Non-GAAP Measure “Center EBITDA”. Please revise to disclose why you believe this measure is meaningful to potential investors as well as the additional purposes, if any, that this measure is used by management. Refer to the guidance in Item 10(e)(1)(i)(C) and (D) of Regulation S-K. Also, as it does not appear that you have adjusted for all SG&A expenses incurred during the periods in arriving at this measure, please explain in further detail how you determined the amounts of the adjustments made for SG&A expenses in arriving at this Non-GAAP measure.
The company responded
The Company acknowledges the Staff’s comment and in future filings the Company will disclose why we believe the Non-GAAP measure “Center EBITDA” is meaningful to potential investors, as well as the additional purposes that this measure is used by management, substantially as set forth below: “Center EBITDA is calculated by (i) adding back to Adjusted EBITDA that portion of the selling, general and administrative expenses which does not directly relate to the operations of our bowling centers and (ii) removing from Adjusted EBITDA income or losses which do not directly relate to the operations of our bowling centers. In addition to the adjustments used to calculate Adjusted EBITDA, items excluded from Center EBITDA include the impact of Media & Other Income, which represents income that does not directly relate to the operations of the bowling centers or the ability of our centers to…
Bowlero Corp. · filed 2023-03-03 · 0001628280-23-006272
SEC staff comment
Comment: You present a measure called “Pre-Depreciation Gross Profit per Ride.” Please explain your consideration of calling this measure “gross profit” when it does not include depreciation, the largest direct expense in your cost of revenues. Please tell us how you considered whether this results in the presentation of a non-GAAP measure that substitutes individually tailored recognition and measurement methods for those of GAAP. Refer to Question 100.04 of the Non-GAAP Financial Measures Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations. Finally, the cost of the vehicle being rented is recognized through depreciation. Therefore, please explain why it is useful to investors to present a measure of profitability on renting a vehicle when it does not include the cost of the vehicle in the computation of profitability.
The company responded
In response to the Staff’s Comment, Marti has revised the “Pre-depreciation Gross Profit per Ride” metric to “Pre-depreciation Contribution” throughout Amendment No. 1 in order to distinguish it from Marti’s gross profit as measured by U.S. GAAP. In making this change, Marti considered whether this results in the presentation of a non-GAAP measure that substitutes individually tailored recognition and measurement methods for those of GAAP. Question 100.04 of the Non-GAAP Financial Measures Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations states that “non-GAAP adjustments that have the effect of changing the recognition and measurement principles required to be applied in accordance with GAAP would be considered individually tailored and may cause the presentation of a non-GAAP measure to be misleading.” The examples given for why non-GAAP measures may be misleading refer to changing the…
Galata Acquisition Corp. · filed 2023-03-01 · 0001104659-23-027458
SEC staff comment
Comment: You present a non-GAAP measure called Adjusted EBITDA which includes adjustments for customs tax provision expenses, revenue adjustment for uncollected receivables, and accounts payables confirmation adjustments. Please further explain how each of these adjustments are not normal, recurring, cash operating expenses necessary to operate your business. Refer to Question 100.01 of the Commission’s Non-GAAP Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations. Please also explain to us the nature of the revenue adjustment and the accounts payable adjustment.
The company responded
In response to the Staff’s comment, the Company has revised the disclosure on page 225 of Amendment No. 1. 41.
Galata Acquisition Corp. · filed 2023-03-01 · 0001104659-23-027458
SEC staff comment
1. We note your response to the comment in our letter dated January 12, 2023. We continue to believe that your adjustments to exclude the losses on purchase commitments from on GAAP adjusted gross profit and non-GAAP adjusted EBITDA is inconsistent with Question 100.01 of the Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations on Non-GAAP Financial Measures and Item 10(e) of Regulation S-K. Please confirm to us that you will no longer include these adjustments in any non-GAAP financial measure presented.
The company responded
We respectfully acknowledge the Staff’s comment and propose revising our disclosure prospectively only. We have removed the Non-GAAP Financial Measures section from our 2022 Annual Report on Form 10-K that we plan to file on February 28, 2023. We have also removed ​ ​ the adjustment for purchase commitments in our tabular disclosure of non-GAAP financial measures in our earnings release included as an exhibit to our Current Report Form 8-K that we plan to file on February 28, 2023 and will include this information as a supplementary footnote to the revised non-GAAP financial measures section in the Form 8-K submissions for ease of reference for our investors. We hope that the foregoing has been responsive to the Staff’s comments. If you have any questions or comments about this letter or need any further information, please call the undersigned at (610) 316-5250. Very truly yours, ​ ​ ​…
Butterfly Network, Inc. · filed 2023-02-27 · 0001558370-23-002194
SEC staff comment
2. We note you present several non-GAAP performance measures in which you eliminate the LIFO decrement charge you recorded in FY 2021. Please more fully explain to us what the LIFO decrement charge represents and why you believe eliminating it from non-GAAP performance measures is appropriate given your use of LIFO to account for the majority of your inventory. Please also specifically address the following: • More fully explain to us how you determined the amount of the LIFO decrement charge and the factors that resulted in the charge. In this regard, we noted disclosures in current and prior year financial statements that indicate the current costs of LIFO valued inventories would be substantially higher which seems to indicate a potentially lower cost basis in older inventory balances; and • More fully explain to us how you considered the guidance in Question 100.04 of the Division…
The company responded
In response to the Staff’s comment, the LIFO decrement charge was a result of the significant reduction in inventory during FY 2021. As required by the LIFO inventory method, the impact of the decrement was calculated by measuring the difference between the current costs of inventories included in costs of sales and the price index of each layer that was liquidated as a result of the FY 2021 inventory reduction or decrement. In total and as the Staff has indicated, the current costs of LIFO valued inventories are significantly higher, however the layers associated with historical increments are higher or lower than current costs depending on the values at the time those LIFO layers were established. In the case of FY 2021, the decrement, which resulted in a charge as opposed to a benefit, was driven by LIFO layers that were liquidated that included a significant layer built in FY 2012…
CARPENTER TECHNOLOGY CORP · filed 2023-02-24 · 0001193125-23-048842
SEC staff comment
3. We note your calculation of the non-GAAP liquidity measure you identify as “free cash flow” appears to differ from the standard calculation of this measure (i.e., cash flows from operations less capital expenditures). In order to avoid potential confusion, please revise the title of your non-GAAP liquidity measure in future filings to “adjusted free cash flow” or something similar. Refer to Question 102.07 of the Division of Corporation Finance’s Compliance & Disclosure Interpretations on Non-GAAP Financial Measures. Carpenter Technology
The company responded
In response to the Staff’s comment, the title of our non-GAAP liquidity measure will be revised to “adjusted free cash flow” in future filings. Consolidated Financial Statements
CARPENTER TECHNOLOGY CORP · filed 2023-02-24 · 0001193125-23-048842
SEC staff comment
3. Based on the guidance in Question 100.01 of the Non-GAAP Financial Measures Compliance & Disclosure Interpretations as updated December 13, 2022, it is unclear how the costs included in adjustments 3 and 4 would not be considered normal, recurring, cash operating expenses necessary to operate your business. Please note that while new center openings may only be occurring occasionally at irregular intervals, they would still be considered part of normal operations. Please provide us with a breakdown of the types of costs that are included in each adjustment and describe and quantify each material component. With reference to the material components, please reassess the guidance in Question 100.01.
The company responded
The Company has reassessed the guidance in Question 100.01 of the Non-GAAP Financial Measures Compliance & Disclosure Interpretations as updated December 13, 2022 and believes that its Adjusted EBITDA metric, considered with the information accompanying its non-GAAP financial measures and other accompanying discussion of its non-GAAP financial measures, does not contain an untrue statement of material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the presentation of its measures, in light of the circumstances in which they are presented, not misleading. The Company respectfully advises the Staff that the Company views de novo centers as opportunistic and discretionary components that may be part of the Company’s growth 2 strategy at any given time, but that such de novo centers are not a part of the Company’s normal operations. At any time, the Company could cease…
CareMax, Inc. · filed 2023-02-23 · 0000950170-23-004165
SEC staff comment
1. Your disclosure in footnote (a) indicates that your adjustments for acquisition and divestiture costs include compensation expenses associated with employee retention. Please tell us the periods over which these types of compensation costs are expected to be incurred. Please note that if these costs are expected to be incurred over periods in excess of one year, they may be considered normal recurring expenses associated with your business which should not be deducted in calculating your Non-GAAP measures. Refer to the guidance in Question 100.01 of the staff's Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations on Non-GAAP Financial Measures.
The company responded
The Company advises the Staff that, within the acquisition and divestiture costs that we reported in our Non-GAAP measures for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2022 in our Form 10-K, there were no employee retention costs related to periods that extended beyond one year of the acquisition date. In response to the Staff´s comment, the Company acknowledges Question 100.01 of the Non-GAAP Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations (“C&DIs”), as well as Rule 100(b) of Regulation G to which Question 100.01 relates. The Company respectfully advises the Staff that the Company has considered the foregoing guidance and believes that its presentation of non-GAAP financial measures that adjust for acquisition and divestiture costs, including compensation expenses associated with employee retention, relate directly to such acquisitions and divestitures, and are not part of our normal, recurring cash…
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp · filed 2023-02-22 · 0001443646-23-000035
SEC staff comment
14. In future filings, please revise your non-GAAP disclosure for the following: • Revise to clarify how the following adjustments for (a) other impairment loss (related to bitcoin), (b) realized gain on sale of bitcoin, and (c) legal fees meet the definitions in Item DOCPROPERTY "CUS_DocIDChunk0" 156137991v3 10(e)(1)(ii)(B) of Regulation S-K, and Questions 100.01 and 102.03 of the Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations on Non-GAAP Financial Measures. • We note your disclosure on page 39 that you have excluded non-cash items that you believe are not reflective of your general business performance and for which the accounting requires management judgment and the resulting expenses could vary significantly in comparison to other companies. In future filings, please revise to disclose in sufficient detail the nature and amounts for all material non-cash items that are excluded. Refer to…
The company responded
The Company acknowledges the Staff’s comment and submits that, taking into account guidance provided in Questions 100.01 and 102.03 of the Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations (as updated on December 13, 2022), it clarified in its non-GAAP measures disclosure in the Quarterly Report to state that some of the excluded items involve cash outlays and some of them recur on a regular basis but that management does not believe any such items are normal operating expenses necessary to generate bitcoin related revenues. The Company also notes that it removed any disclosure implying that all such adjustments were non-recurring. The Company further submits that the new disclosure specifically identifies each adjustment to Adjusted EBITDA, including each non-cash line item, and each such item is quantified in the reconciliation table. The Company further notes that similarly modified the…
CLEANSPARK, INC. · filed 2023-02-22 · 0000950170-23-003846
SEC staff comment
1. Your reconciliation of EBITDA to Operating Cash Flows presents the non-GAAP measure more prominently than the comparable GAAP measure. Please revise the Securities and Exchange Commission February 17, 2023 Page 2 reconciliation to begin with the net cash used in operating activities for equal or greater prominence. Refer to Item 10(e)(1)(i)(B) of Regulation S-K and Question 102.10(b) of the Non-GAAP Financial Measures Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations. This comment also applies to your disclosure in the Form 10-Q for fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2022 and Item 2.02 Form 8-K dated February 7, 2023.
The company responded
A-Mark acknowledges the Staff’s comment and advises the Staff that in future filings, the Company will disclose the most directly comparable GAAP measure with equal or greater prominence. Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk, page 55
A-Mark Precious Metals, Inc. · filed 2023-02-17 · 0000950170-23-003195
SEC staff comment
1 . We note from your response to our prior comment, that you believe excluding the costs and revenue related to inventory write-downs and liquidation of end-of-life inventory from the non-GAAP performance measure is appropriate because it was non-recurring and part of your simplification initiatives. However, we continue to believe that the adjustments are not consistent with the guidance in Question 100.01 of the Staff's CD&I on Non-GAAP Financial Measures. Although the inventory liquidation was related to exiting a product line, it did not qualify for discontinued operations and we believe these types of inventory write-offs are normal charges incurred by businesses. Please revise to remove these adjustments from your non-GAAP financial measures in future filings.
The company responded
The Company respectfully acknowledges the Staff’s Comment and informs the Staff that it will remove these adjustments from its non-GAAP financial measures in future filings. * * * Page 1 Please contact me with any questions or further comments regarding our response to the Staff’s
Allbirds, Inc. · filed 2023-02-17 · 0001653909-23-000011
SEC staff comment
2. Please explain the following as it relates to the information provided in your response to prior comment 4: · Describe further the strategic discussions in the weekly meetings with the Executive Team. While you state that these meetings are not intended for the review of financial information, tell us whether financial information is ever received by the CODM and discussed in the weekly Executive meetings and if so, provide us a detailed description of such information. · Tell us the purpose of the weekly one-on-one meetings with the CODM’s direct reports, including whether goals and objectives are discussed. If so, tell us whether these are financial or performance goals and explain how you evaluate the progress towards meeting such goals. · Describe in detail the financial information discussed in the weekly one-on-one meetings between the CODM and the COO and CFO and how such…
The company responded
In response to Comment No. 2 and in furtherance of the telephone conversations held among the Staff, the Company and representatives of Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP and Ernst & Young LLP, as applicable, set forth below is a supplemental response. After further evaluation of our application of ASC 280, we have reevaluated our operating segments in the fourth quarter of 2022 given the discrete financial information included in our monthly financial reporting packages provided to our CODM. This discrete financial information included separate income statements for the following four components of our business: U.S. Marketplace, CarOffer, United Kingdom and Canada. As such, we have concluded that as of December 31, 2022, the foregoing four components represent four operating segments. In determining our reportable segments, we have applied the quantitative threshold guidance outlined in ASC…
CarGurus, Inc. · filed 2023-02-17 · 0001104659-23-023302
SEC staff comment
1. We note your response to our prior comment 1 that you began including this adjustment related to contract termination/restructuring costs and loss provisions in your non-GAAP financial measures in your disclosures for the third quarter ended February 29, 2020 following the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. You indicate that due to the unprecedented impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on your operations and your commercial activities, multiple contracts with your airlines customer were terminated and/or restructured to address the challenging operating environment. We also note your response that you have continued to include gains and losses related to the original contract actions and gains from new, significant contractual events that were similar to the adjustments reflected in prior periods to ensure consistency in your presentation. For example, your long-term contract supporting…
The company responded
The Company acknowledges the Staff’s comment. With respect to future contract termination/restructuring gains/losses or minimum volume guarantees, we may continue to adjust for those items in future periods to the extent they relate to significant contractual events of the type referred to in the Staff’s comment. That said, we would not include as adjustments cash charges/gains related to those events that are considered normal, recurring cash operating expenses. ****************** In connection with responding to the Staff’s comment, the Company acknowledges that: • The Company is responsible for the adequacy and accuracy of the disclosure in its filings; • Staff comments or changes to disclosure in response to Staff comments do not foreclose the Commission from taking any action with respect to the Company’s filings; and • The Company may not assert Staff comments as a defense in any…
AAR CORP · filed 2023-02-15 · 0001104659-23-022305
SEC staff comment
1. We note that you reconcile EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA to operating income. Please revise your presentation in future annual and quarterly filings to reconcile these non- GAAP measures to net income, the most directly comparable GAAP measure. Refer to Item 10(e)(1)(i)(B) of Regulations S-K and Question 103.02 of the SEC ’ s Division of Corporation Finance C&DIs on Non-GAAP Measures. This comment also applies to your earnings releases furnished on Form 8-K.
The company responded
We acknowledge your comment and direction, and we will revise our presentation in future annual and quarterly reports and, as applicable, our Form 8-K reports to reconcile EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA to net income. You may contact me at (513) 793-3200 with any questions. Sincerely, LSI INDUSTRIES INC. By: /s/ James E. Galeese James E. Galeese Chief Financial Officer cc: F. Mark Reuter, Keating Muething & Klekamp PLL
LSI INDUSTRIES INC · filed 2023-02-14 · 0001437749-23-003239
SEC staff comment
12. In regards to your non-GAAP measures, please address the following: · Clearly disclose which are the non-GAAP measures(e.g., Total Revenue, Cost of Revenue, Gross Profit, Adjusted G&A, Adjusted EBITDA) and provide a discussion of the reasons by management believe the measures are useful to investors; · For all of your non-GAAP measures in response to the bullet above, include quantitative reconciliations for all periods, including for the TTM September 2022 period, to the comparable GAAP measures. · Include a description of the gross amounts included in the Non-recurring expenses adjustment; and · Include the details of the footnotes to the table you have presented.
The company responded
We have revised the disclosure on page 94-95 of Amendment No. 1, to include reconciliations, descriptions and footnotes as requested by the Staff. We note that the non-GAAP measure included in the calculations is Adjusted EBITDA, which management believes to be useful to investors as a measure of the financial performance of the Company on a recurring basis. Ms. Block and Mr. Brown U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission February 10, 2023 Page 6
Binah Capital Group, Inc. · filed 2023-02-10 · 0001104659-23-018655
SEC staff comment
14. We note your presentation of "Pro Forma" financial results for the periods presented. Please tell us whether this represents pro forma information consistent with Article 11 of Regulation S-X. If so, tell us how it reconciles to the Article 11 Pro Forma information on pages 115-124. In addition, tell us how you considered Question 100.05 of the Non-GAAP Financial Measures C&DI updated on December 13, 2022.
The company responded
We acknowledge the Staff’s comment and respectfully respond that the proforma financial information on pages 120-122 of Amendment No. 1 is based on historical information of KWAC and WMS and that the unaudited proforma adjustments are based on information that is currently available and disclosed in the notes to the pro forma information. We further respond that the proforma information on pages 120-123 of Amendment No.1 is prepared to present the balance sheet and income statement on a post-closing basis, and the proforma information on page 95 of Amendment No. 1 was used for purposes of evaluating the target opportunity and therefore does not include information related to KWAC or any adjustments related to the merger and the closing of the transaction. Ms. Block and Mr. Brown U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission February 10, 2023 Page 7 Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined…
Binah Capital Group, Inc. · filed 2023-02-10 · 0001104659-23-018655
SEC staff comment
1. Please address the following comments related to your presentation of net working capital (“NWC”) and NWC as a percentage of annualized net sales: • You describe NWC and the annualized percentage as “key metrics that measure our liquidity.” Tell us why you refer to these items as metrics and not non-GAAP measures. • We note that NWC is calculated as “current quarter accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts, plus inventories and contract assets, less accounts payable” and that it excludes certain current liabilities. Tell us how your presentation complies with Item 10(e)(1)(ii)(A) of Regulation S-K, which generally prohibits excluding charges or liabilities that required or will require cash settlement from non-GAAP liquidity measures. Also see the third bullet of Question 102.10(a) of the Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations on Non-GAAP Financial Measures.…
The company responded
The Company respectfully acknowledges the Staff’s comment and advises the Staff that in future filings, the Company will remove the references to NWC and NWC as a percentage of annualized sales and use instead the ASC Master Glossary definition of net working capital (i.e., current assets less current liabilities) to measure and discuss the Company’s liquidity. Consolidated Statements of Operations, page 55
FLEX LTD. · filed 2023-02-10 · 0000866374-23-000019
SEC staff comment
1. We note your presentation of "primary working capital" that is calculated as "accounts receivable, plus inventories, minus trade accounts payable” and that excludes certain current liabilities. Please tell us how your presentation complies with Item 10(e)(1)(ii)(A) of Regulation S-K, which generally prohibits excluding charges or liabilities that required or will require cash settlement from non-GAAP liquidity measures. Also see the third bullet of Question 102.10(a) of the Compliance and Disclosure Interpretation on Non-GAAP Financial Measures.
The company responded
We have reviewed Item 10(e)(1)(ii)(A) of Regulation S-K and the third bullet of Question 102.10(a) of the Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations on Non-GAAP Financial Measures. Our use of the “primary working capital” metric is more appropriately categorized as a key performance indicator (KPI) used to measure the asset intensity and operating efficiency of our business on a company-wide basis that management can monitor and analyze over time. We will revise our description to this effect in future filings, cease referring to the term as a liquidity measure based on the guidance provided under Item 10(e)(1)(ii)(A) of Regulation S-K and remove any discussion of primary working capital from the “Liquidity and Capital Resources” section of the Company’s MD&A. To the extent that we use this KPI in future filings, we will identify it as “primary operating capital” and will discuss its…
EnerSys · filed 2023-02-07 · 0001289308-23-000004
SEC staff comment
2. When you present or discuss non-GAAP measures, please ensure that the corresponding GAAP measures are presented or discussed with equal or greater prominence. We note the following items in your press release: • An introductory bullet mentions "Adj GM" movements without a corresponding GAAP reference. • The table on the first page includes EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA but not net income. • The "Message from the CEO" discusses adjusted gross margin and adjusted diluted EPS without corresponding GAAP discussions. See Item 10(e)(1)(i)(A) of Regulation S-K and Questions 102.10(a) and Question 103.01 of the Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations on Non-GAAP Financial Measures.
The company responded
We have reviewed Item 10(e)(1)(i)(A) of Regulation S-K and Questions 102.10(a) and Question 103.01 of the Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations on Non-GAAP Financial Measures. In connection with future earnings releases, we will ensure that, when we present or discuss non-GAAP financial measures, the corresponding GAAP financial measures are presented or discussed with equal or greater prominence.
EnerSys · filed 2023-02-07 · 0001289308-23-000004
SEC staff comment
3. We note that you quantify a range of forward-looking adjusted diluted earnings per share for the subsequent quarter. To the extent available without unreasonable efforts, please revise future filings to provide a reconciliation to the most directly comparable GAAP measure. If relying on the unreasonable efforts exception, please disclose as such and identify the information that is not available. See Item 10(e)(1)(i)(B) of Regulation S-K and Question 102.10(b) of the Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations on Non-GAAP Financial Measures.
The company responded
We have reviewed Item 10(e)(1)(i)(B) of Regulation S-K and Question 102.10(b) of the Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations on Non-GAAP Financial Measures. In response to the Staff’s comment, we intend in future filings, as applicable, to add certain additional disclosures to clarify the fact that the Company is relying on the “unreasonable efforts” exception in Item 10(e)(1)(i)(B) of Regulation S-K and to identify more specifically any information that is unavailable and its probable significance. The Company anticipates that these additional disclosures will include the following: • Add the following disclosure to the lead in paragraphs under the heading “Reconciliations of GAAP to Non-GAAP Financial Measures” of the Company’s earnings release: EnerSys does not provide a quantitative reconciliation of the company’s projected range for adjusted diluted earnings per share for the x…
EnerSys · filed 2023-02-07 · 0001289308-23-000004
SEC staff comment
1. Adjusted EBITDA appears to be a company-level non-GAAP measure, rather than a store-level non-GAAP measure, like store operating income before depreciation and amortization. Please remove the pre-opening expenses adjustment from Adjusted EBITDA, as it appears to represent normal, recurring, cash operating expenses necessary to operate your business. Refer to Question 100.01 of the Non-GAAP Financial Measures Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations. Securities Exchange Commission Division of Corporate Finance February 3, 2023 Page 2
The company responded
The Company acknowledges the Staff’s comment and will remove the pre-opening expenses from Adjusted EBITDA in future filings. Should any questions arise in connection with the filing or this response letter, please contact the undersigned at (972) 813-1151. Sincerely, DAVE & BUSTER’S ENTERTAINMENT, INC. /s/ Michael Quartieri Name: Michael Quartieri Title: Chief Financial Officer
Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc. · filed 2023-02-03 · 0001104659-23-010224
SEC staff comment
1. We note you present various non-GAAP financial measures which contain several reconciling items. Please tell us and revise your discussion to further describe the nature of each adjustment and the reasons why management believes the adjustment and information is useful to investors including for the following items: investigation and remediation compliance costs, contract termination/restructuring costs and loss provisions, net, customer bankruptcy and credit charges (recoveries), gain on legal settlement, and costs related to strategic projects. Specifically also address why each of these components is deemed appropriate when considering the SEC Staff's Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations on Non-GAAP Financial Measures. 1
The company responded
The Company acknowledges the Staff’s comment. We are providing below a summary of the nature of the adjustments identified in the comment and the reasons management believes that the adjustments provide our shareholders and other interested parties with meaningful supplemental information. We also are providing a sample of additional disclosure that we intend to include in future filings relating to the adjustments identified in the comment. We believe our non-GAAP financial measures are relevant and useful for management, shareholders, and other interested parties because they provide supplemental information that management believes reflect our core operating performance and cash flows unaffected by the impact of certain items that management does not believe are indicative of our ongoing and core operating activities. When reviewed in conjunction with our GAAP results and our…
AAR CORP · filed 2023-02-01 · 0001104659-23-009169
SEC staff comment
2. We note your adjusted cash provided by (used in) operating activities from continuing operations which adjusts for the change in amounts outstanding on your accounts receivable financing program. Please further explain why management believes this measure is useful to investors and address and why this measurement is deemed appropriate when considering the SEC Staff's Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations on Non-GAAP Financial Measures. Additionally, tell us where the adjusting items are included within the statement of cash flows.
The company responded
We exclude the impact of our accounts receivable financing program from our adjusted cash provided by operating activities from continuing operations as management believes our shareholders and other interested parties view the program as a financing instrument. Nonetheless, the program meets the requirements for treatment as a sale of accounts receivable in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification 860, Transfers and Servicing , which requires classification of the program’s cash transactions as operating activities on our statement of cash flows. The timing of our accounts receivable sales and servicing activities impact our cash flow from operations, and management has determined to exclude this impact to provide our shareholders and other interested parties with meaningful supplemental information for use in analyzing our business performance and cash flows. In this regard,…
AAR CORP · filed 2023-02-01 · 0001104659-23-009169
SEC staff comment
1. We see from your response that you will remove the non-recurring categorization for losses on purchase commitments and inventory write-downs in future filings. Please explain to us your consideration of the guidance in Item 10(e)(1)(ii)(b) of Regulation S-K and Question 100.01 of the Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations on Non-GAAP Financial Measures in determining why you believe these adjustments, which appear to be costs incurred in the ordinary course of your business, are appropriate.
The company responded
We respectfully advise the Staff that we do not consider the aforementioned adjustments to be a normal operating expense and believe they provide investors with a more clear picture of ​ our financial performance. We consider these adjustments to be outside the normal course of business because the underlying transactions can be traced back to the Company early stage of commercialization and therefore differ from our current strategic and operational processes that have developed as the Company matured. With regards to the inventory write-offs adjustments, they were isolated to a product transition away from our first-generation device. As the Company’s product planning strategy has evolved, we expect future product transitions to be more gradual, and the recurrence of such inventory write-offs is unlikely. With respect to the adjustments for losses on purchase commitments, they stem…
Butterfly Network, Inc. · filed 2023-01-27 · 0001558370-23-000660
SEC staff comment
11. We continue to believe that your adjustment to exclude mine development costs is inconsistent with the guidance in Question 100.01 of the Non-GAAP Financial Measures Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations. Pleaseconfirm to us that you will no longer include the adjustment in any non-GAAP financial measures and revise to present your measure in accordance with Item 10(e) of Regulation S-X and Regulation G.
The company responded
We agree with the comment and have revised our filing accordingly. Regards, Kirk P. Taylor, CPA Chief Financial Officer American Resources Corp
American Resources Corp · filed 2023-01-20 · 0001654954-23-000629
SEC staff comment
1. Your calculation of EBITDA contains adjustments for items other than interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. Please relabel or revise your presentation as necessary. Refer to Question 103.01 of the Non-GAAP Financial Measures Compliance & Disclosures Interpretations. Also, in accordance with Item 10(e)(1)(i)(C), expand your disclosures to address the reasons why management believes the presentation of EBITDA provides useful information to investors regarding your results of operations. In this regard, we note your discussion only addresses Adjusted EBITDA.
The company responded
Beginning with the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022, the Company intends to simplify the presentation by removing the reference to EBITDA. As such, 1 beginning with the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022, the disclosure will be shown as presented in the response to Comment #3.
CareMax, Inc. · filed 2023-01-17 · 0000950170-23-000791
SEC staff comment
2. You indicate in your headnote to your reconciliation that Adjusted EBITDA is a pro forma measure. We have the following comments on your presentation: • Tell us and disclose if the pro forma net (loss)/income amounts used in your reconciliation were prepared in accordance with Article 11 of Regulation S-X. If such information has not been prepared in accordance with Article 11, please revise to disclose the basis for the presentation and revise the description of the measures accordingly. Refer to Question 100.05 of the Non-GAAP Measures Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations as updated December 13, 2022; • If the pro forma net (loss)/income amounts are prepared in accordance with Article 11, more clearly label the EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA amounts presented to indicate that they are pro forma amounts;
The company responded
On June 8, 2021, we completed the Business Combination, as defined in our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021. We believe our Adjusted EBITDA, which includes pro forma adjustments calculated in a manner consistent with Article 11 of Regulation S-X (Article 8 for smaller reporting companies), provides investors with meaningful insights into the impact of the Business Combination. We believe that inclusion of pro forma adjustments provides information to investors on a more comparable basis. For clarity, in future filings, the Company will enhance its disclosures in the second paragraph under the Supplemental Non-GAAP Information sub-heading as follows (deletions appear as strike through and additions in bold and underline ): EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA Management defines “EBITDA” as net income or net loss before interest expense, income tax expense or benefit, depreciation and…
CareMax, Inc. · filed 2023-01-17 · 0000950170-23-000791
SEC staff comment
4. In the headnote to non-GAAP operating metrics, you state that the chart presented is a pro forma view of your operations. Tell us and disclose if these pro forma metrics were prepared in accordance with Article 11 of Regulation S-X. If such information has not been prepared in accordance with Article 11, please revise to disclose the basis for presentation and revise the description of the measures accordingly. Refer to Question 100.05 of the Non-GAAP Measures Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations as updated December 13, 2022. Ensure that you appropriately label each metric accordingly.
The company responded
On June 8, 2021, we completed the Business Combination, as defined in our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021. We believe our Pro Forma Adjusted EBITDA, which includes pro forma adjustments calculated in a manner consistent with Article 11 of Regulation S-X (Article 8 for smaller reporting companies), provides investors with meaningful insights into the impact of the Business Combination. We also believe that this non-GAAP measure provides information to investors on a more comparable basis than would be provided without the incremental results of a full period of operations. For clarity, in future filings, the Company will enhance its disclosures in the second paragraph under the Supplemental Non-GAAP Information sub-heading as follows (deletions appear as strike through and additions in bold and underline ): 5 In addition to our GAAP financial information, we review a…
CareMax, Inc. · filed 2023-01-17 · 0000950170-23-000791
SEC staff comment
10. We note your response to prior comment 24. Please revise to present net income (loss). To the extent that gross profit is a non-GAAP measure, please either remove this measure or provide a reconciliation. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission January 13, 2023 Page 4
The company responded
The Company has revised the disclosure on page 26 to present net loss. In addition, the Company has revised the disclosure on page 26 to refer to “gross margin”, which is not a non-GAAP financial measure. Exchangeable Shares, page 24
Canopy Growth Corp · filed 2023-01-13 · 0001193125-23-008525
SEC staff comment
Comment: We note you provided 2022 outlook and outlook ranges for certain non-GAAP financial measures. In future filings, please provide the reconciliations required by Item 10(e)(1)(i) of Regulation S-K. To the extent you are relying on the “unreasonable efforts” exception in Item 10(e)(1)(i)(B), please explicitly state that is the case and identify the information that is unavailable. Also note that in order to present a more balanced disclosure, it is preferable to present a corresponding measure of GAAP-based projected income when disclosing projected revenue. Refer to Item 10(b) of Regulation S-K.
The company responded
We acknowledge the Staff’s comment and respectfully advise the Staff that the Company will provide the reconciliation required by Item 10(e)(1)(i) of Regulation S-K in future filings. In addition, the Company will refer to Item 10(b) of Regulation S-K for potential additional disclosure that presents a corresponding measure of GAAP-based projected income when disclosing projected revenues in future filings. 2. Staff’s
JOINT Corp · filed 2023-01-13 · 0001628280-23-001000
SEC staff comment
12. When you discuss or present the non-GAAP measure of Adjusted EBITDA, please revise to consistently present the most directly comparable GAAP measure of net loss with equal or greater prominence. Refer to Item 10(e)(1)(i)(A) of Regulation S-K and Question 102.10(a) of the Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations for Non-GAAP Financial Measures.
The company responded
We have revised the relevant table to show the GAAP measure of net loss with greater prominence, as per aforesaid Item 10 of Regulation S-K. Interim Period, page 37
GlobalTech Corp · filed 2023-01-12 · 0001477932-23-000215
SEC staff comment
16. Please remove the subtotals within cash flows from operating activities of “Operating income before working capital changes” and “Cash (used in) generated from operating activities.” These measures are non-GAAP and prohibited from being presented on the face of financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP. Refer to Item 10(e)(ii)(C) of Regulation S-K. Please make corresponding changes to the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows on page F-39.
The company responded
In response to the Staff’s comment, the Company has updated its cash flows on pages F-5 and F-39 of Form-10. This will be addressed in Form 10 Amendment No. 3.
GlobalTech Corp · filed 2023-01-12 · 0001477932-23-000215
SEC staff comment
1. We note that you subtract purchased gas expenses from revenues to arrive at your non-GAAP measure, “gross margin (non-GAAP)” and that you have identified operating revenues as the most directly comparable GAAP measure. Given this calculation subtracts an expense from revenues, it appears that your non-GAAP measure is more akin to a margin type measure that should be reconciled to gross margin as defined in GAAP. Please tell us why you have not identified gross margin as defined by GAAP as the most directly comparable GAAP measure and revise to provide a corresponding reconciliation that complies with Item 10(e)(1)(i)(B) of Regulation S-K.
The company responded
We have considered the Staff’s comment and we will remove the disclosure of “gross margin (non-GAAP)” in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, beginning with our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022. We had presented gross margin (non-GAAP) as we believe it provides a meaningful basis to evaluate and analyze our regulated natural gas segment performance since the Company’s operating revenues are affected by the cost of natural gas. Further, we believe the removal of purchased gas costs from operating revenues provides a more direct year-over-year comparison of performance for investors, especially given the market volatility and fluctuation in natural gas prices. The Company’s operating revenues includes revenues, or refunds of revenue, based upon a purchased gas adjustment mechanism that has no margin and…
Essential Utilities, Inc. · filed 2023-01-10 · 0001552781-23-000006
SEC staff comment
2. We note you disclose operating income, income before income taxes and net income (loss) for each of your reportable segments. Considering you disclose more than one measure of segment profit or loss, please revise to disclose only one measure that you believe is determined in accordance with the measurement principles most consistent with those used in measuring the corresponding amount in the consolidated statements of operations. Refer to ASC 280-10-50-28. In addition, to the extent that the measures that are not identified as the segment measure of profit or loss under ASC 280 are presented outside the consolidated financial statements, please label them as non-GAAP financial measures and provide the required disclosures under Item 10(e) of Regulation S-K.
The company responded
We have considered the Staff’s comment and will revise our disclosure in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 18 – Segment Information, beginning with our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022. We will revise the disclosure to disclose only one measure of segment performance that we believe to be determined in accordance with the measurement principles most consistent with those used in measuring the corresponding amount in the consolidated statements of operations. In referring to ASC 280-10-50-28, the Company’s chief operating decision maker primarily uses one measure of a segment’s profit or loss, and the measure is determined in accordance with the measurement principles most consistent with those used in measuring the corresponding amounts in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. The measure selected to be disclosed in future…
Essential Utilities, Inc. · filed 2023-01-10 · 0001552781-23-000006
SEC staff comment
1. We note you disclose the margin for Adjusted EBITDA. Please present with greater or equal prominence the comparable margin, net income/ (loss) margin, computed on a GAAP basis wherever this non-GAAP margin is presented. Refer to Item 10(e)(1)(i)(A) of Regulation S-K and Question 102.10(a) of the staff's Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations "Non-GAAP Financial Measures."
The company responded
The Company acknowledges the Staff’s comment and confirms that in future filings the Company will present any non-GAAP financial margin, including Adjusted EBITDA margin, along with the most directly comparable GAAP margin with equal or greater prominence, consistent with Item 10(e)(1)(i)(A) of Regulation S-K and Question 102.10(a) of the Staff's Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations "Non-GAAP Financial Measures." Specifically, the Company will present the comparable GAAP measure of Net income (loss) margin with equal or greater prominence than the non-GAAP measure of Adjusted EBITDA margin. We appreciate the opportunity to respond to your comment. If you have further comments or questions, we stand ready to respond as quickly as possible. If you wish to contact us, you can reach Patrick Grosso, the Company’s Chief Legal Officer, at (949) 322-3379 or Peter Wardle of Gibson, Dunn &…
F45 Training Holdings Inc. · filed 2023-01-10 · 0001788717-23-000002
SEC staff comment
1. Please provide us with the disclosures you intend to provide in your next earnings release to explain to investors why you recognized no income tax expense adjustment on $13.8 million of non-GAAP net income in a three-year cumulative income position.
The company responded
The Company proposes to include the following disclosure as a separate section under “Use of non-GAAP Financial Measures” in its 8-K related to its upcoming fourth quarter results: “The Company has determined that the non-GAAP adjustments presented in the reconciliation of non-GAAP financial measures to GAAP financial measures do not have a corresponding tax effect. These non-GAAP adjustments relate primarily to the U.S. entity, which currently has a full valuation allowance against its cumulative GAAP losses. On a non-GAAP basis, the Company’s U.S. entity did have a recent history of taxable income through December 31, 2021. However, after further considering at that date the financial investments and uncertainties of the AviClear product launch planned for 2022, together with the macroeconomic uncertainty that began manifesting itself, the Company concluded that its ability to rely on…
CUTERA INC · filed 2023-01-09 · 0001628280-23-000799
SEC staff comment
2. We note your reconciliation of GAAP condensed consolidated statements of operations to non-GAAP condensed Consolidated Statements of operations for fiscal years 2019, 2020, 2021 and for the nine-months ended September 30, 2022. As previously requested in comment 3 in our letter dated November 4, 2022, we requested that you remove this type of presentation and reconcile each non-GAAP measure used by management separately to the most comparable GAAP measure. In your letter dated November 29, 2022, you stated, "...the Company will remove the presentation of non-GAAP condensed consolidated statements of operations. Instead, we will include tables reconciling each non-GAAP measure presented to the most comparable GAAP measure." Please advise. We refer you to Question 102.10(c) of the non-GAAP Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations for guidance.
The company responded
We respectfully advise the staff that the Company intended to update the investor presentation consistent with the response in our letter dated November 29, 2022, beginning with reporting the results of operations for the quarter and the year ending December 31, 2022. We did not update the non-GAAP financial data presented in the Form 8-K dated December 7, 2022, as the information that was included in the Company’s investor presentation was the most recent information filed with the SEC and made available on our web site. We commit to updating the prior historical non-GAAP financial data in all future investor presentations and filings. * * * * * Please direct any questions that you have with respect to the foregoing or if any additional supplemental information is required by the Staff, please contact the undersigned at (415) 657-5507. Very truly yours, CUTERA, INC. By: /s/ Rohan Seth…
CUTERA INC · filed 2023-01-09 · 0001628280-23-000799
SEC staff comment
3. Please revise the information presented on pages 12 and 13 as Non-GAAP Combined as this characterization does not appear to be appropriate.
The company responded
The Company respectfully acknowledges the Staff’s comment. While the Company believes our presentation allowed investors to better understand our underlying business through the Chapter 11 process during the periods presented while clearly indicating that such measure was a non-GAAP presentation, the Company will cease presenting financial and operational information, including production volumes, average prices received and average production costs, on a Non-GAAP Combined basis in future filings, beginning with our Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year ended December 31, 2022. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, page 39
GULFPORT ENERGY CORP · filed 2023-01-09 · 0001213900-23-001583
SEC staff comment
4. It appears that you have presented 2021 results and other information as the mathematical addition of the predecessor (January 1, 2021 to May 17, 2021) and successor periods (May 18, 2021 to December 31, 2021). We also note that you recognize this combined presentation does not comply with GAAP and has not been prepared as pro forma results under applicable regulations. This type of presentation does not appear to be appropriate for periods when fresh start accounting was applied and the characterization of this information as non-GAAP does not appear to be consistent with Item 10(e) of Regulation S-K. Please tell us why this presentation is appropriate or remove it and revise the narrative discussion of your operating results.
The company responded
The Company respectfully acknowledges the Staff’s comment. While the Company believes our presentation allowed investors to better understand our underlying business through the Chapter 11 process during the periods presented while clearly indicating that such measure was a non-GAAP presentation, the Company will cease presenting financial and operational information on a Non-GAAP Combined basis throughout our future filings, beginning with our Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year ended December 31, 2022, in accordance with Item 10(e) of Regulation S-K. 2 Business and Industry Outlook, page 41
GULFPORT ENERGY CORP · filed 2023-01-09 · 0001213900-23-001583
SEC staff comment
8. Please provide us with an explanation for presenting Non-GAAP Combined measures for the predecessor and successor periods identified in your Form 8-K.
The company responded
The Company respectfully acknowledges the Staff’s comment. While the Company believes our presentation allowed investors to better understand our underlying business through the Chapter 11 process during the periods presented while clearly indicating that such measure was a non-GAAP presentation, the Company will cease presenting financial and operational information on a Non-GAAP Combined basis throughout our future filings, beginning with our earnings release and supplemental financial information for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022.
GULFPORT ENERGY CORP · filed 2023-01-09 · 0001213900-23-001583
SEC staff comment
9. Expand your disclosure regarding forward-looking non-GAAP measures where you are relying on the exception per Item 10(e)(1)(i)(B) of Regulation S-K to clearly disclose your reliance on the exception and to identify the information that is unavailable and its probable significance in a location of equal or greater prominence. See Question 102.10(b) of the Compliance & Disclosure Interpretations regarding Non-GAAP Financial Measures.
The company responded
The Company respectfully acknowledges the Staff’s comment. The Company will expand our disclosure in applicable future filings, beginning with our earnings release and supplemental financial information for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022, to expressly note our reliance on the exception regarding forward-looking non-GAAP measures included in Item 10(e)(1)(i)(B) of Regulation S-K and to identify the information that is unavailable and its probable significance in a location of equal or greater prominence.
GULFPORT ENERGY CORP · filed 2023-01-09 · 0001213900-23-001583

Showing the 60 most recent of 67.