edgarwiki

Non-GAAP measures

1384 staff comments in this corpus, to 633 registrants, across 14 of the 15 calendar quarters this corpus covers.

Coverage is partial and not continuous. This corpus holds CORRESP filings from 2023Q1–2026Q3 (83–100% of each quarter's EDGAR total). It holds nothing filed after 2026-07-17. If an issue page shows no comment from one of those periods, the reason is that edgarwiki has no data for it — not that the staff raised nothing. Counts on this site are counts within this corpus and are not SEC-wide totals. Every quotation is verbatim and links to its filing; what is incomplete is coverage, not accuracy. Per-quarter figures: Methodology.
MeasureValue
Comments raising this issue1384
Share of all 92,899 comments in the corpus1.5%
Distinct registrants633
With a recorded company response1383

When these comments were filed

By the quarter the CORRESP filing was filed. The third column is how much of that quarter's EDGAR CORRESP output this corpus holds — read it before comparing two rows. A quarter marked never ingested contributes no comments to this page for reasons that have nothing to do with the SEC.

QuarterComments here Corpus coverage of that quarter
2023Q111293%
2023Q219091%
2023Q314693%
2023Q411796%
2024Q110893%
2024Q220383%
2024Q315590%
2024Q414796%
2025Q110092%
2025Q25489%
2025Q32990%
2025Q41093%
2026Q1985%
2026Q24100%
2026Q30100%

The exchanges

Verbatim, most recent first. Quotations are exact spans from the filing linked beneath each one; long passages are truncated with an ellipsis and never altered.

SEC staff comment
19. Please revise to provide the disclosures required by Item 100(a) of Regulation G, including a reconciliation of this non-GAAP measure to the most directly comparable GAAP measure per Item 100(a)(2).
The company responded
The Company respectfully acknowledges the Staff’s comment and is furnishing a copy of the Updated Teamshares Presentation to the Commission as Exhibit 99.1 to the Amended Current Report on Form 8-K intended to be responsive to the Staff’s comment. Historical Financial Results and Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Measures, Page 81
Live Oak Acquisition Corp. V · filed 2026-04-28 · 0001213900-26-048641
SEC staff comment
2. Please remove all references to the non-GAAP measure consolidated Operating EBITDA and associated amounts, including measures the computation of which are based on this measure, such as Pro Forma Operating EBITDA and Return on Equity, since the Corporate Expenses adjustment appears to exclude normal, recurring, cash operating expenses. Refer to Questions 100.01 and 104.04 of the Non-GAAP Financial Measures Corporation Finance Interpretations.
The company responded
The Company respectfully acknowledges the Staff’s comment and is furnishing a copy of the Updated Teamshares Presentation to the Commission as Exhibit 99.1 to the Amended Current Report. The Updated Teamshares Presentation has been revised to remove references to consolidated Operating EBITDA and associated amounts and measures the computation of which are based on or derived from such metric, including Pro Forma Operating EBITDA and Return on Equity . * * * 2 We thank you for your review of the foregoing and the Form 8-K/A and Exhibit 99.1. Should you have any questions or require any additional information, please do not hesitate to contact our legal counsel, Meredith Laitner, Esq., of Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLP, at mlaitner@egsllp.com or by telephone at (212) 370-1300. Very truly yours, Live oak acquisition corp. v By: /s/ Richard J. Hendrix Name: Richard J. Hendrix Title:…
Live Oak Acquisition Corp. V · filed 2026-04-28 · 0001213900-26-048641
SEC staff comment
2. We note that you disclose full year 2026 guidance for non-GAAP measures, including Net operating income, Managed REIT EBITDA and Third-party platform adjusted EBITDA, without providing a reconciliation to the most directly related GAAP measure. In future filings, please include such reconciliation or, alternatively, provide a statement that the information could not be presented without unreasonable efforts under Item 10(e)(1)(i)(B) of Regulation S-K. Refer also to Questions 102.10(a) and 102.10(b) of the Corporation Finance Interpretations (“CFIs”) for Non-GAAP Financial Measures.
The company responded
We acknowledge the Staff’s comment and confirm that in future filings, we will provide such reconciliations or, alternatively, if applicable, provide a statement that the information could not be presented without unreasonable efforts under Item 10(e)(1)(i)(B) of Regulation S-K, as applicable. If you have any questions, or require additional information or documents, please contact the undersigned. Very truly yours, SMARTSTOP SELF STORAGE REIT, INC. By: /s/ James R. Barry James R. Barry Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer Phone: (949) 542-4513 Direct Email: jbarry@smartstop.com) cc: H. Hirsch, Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLP N. Look, General Counsel and Secretary, SmartStop Self Storage REIT, Inc. Brent Horak, BDO USA, P.C. SmartStop Self Storage | 10 Terrace Road, Ladera Ranch, CA 92694 | 949.429.6600 | smartstop.com
SmartStop Self Storage REIT, Inc. · filed 2026-04-24 · 0001193125-26-177627
SEC staff comment
1. We note your presentation of Adjusted FFO Attributable to Common Stockholders per Diluted share here and as part of your 2026 Outlook. In future periodic filings, please present with equal or greater prominence the most directly comparable measure calculated in accordance with GAAP for this non-GAAP financial measure. Refer to Item 10(e)(1)(i)(A) of Regulation S-K and Question 102.10(a) of the Division’s Corporation Finance Interpretations on Non-GAAP Financial Measures. April 22, 2026 Page 2
The company responded
The Company respectfully informs the Staff that in applicable future filings, it will revise its disclosures to present with equal or greater prominence Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Common Stockholders per Diluted Share, which is the most directly comparable measure calculated in accordance with GAAP. Set forth in Exhibit A hereto is a copy of the earnings release that was included as an exhibit to the Form 8-K, which has been marked to show the Company’s proposed revisions in response to the Staff’s comment (additions appear in bold underline and deletions in strikethrough font). * * * * * If you have any questions or comments with regard to these responses or other matters, or would like any additional information, please call the undersigned at (213) 891-7421. Sincerely, /s/ Steven B. Stokdyk Steven B. Stokdyk of LATHAM & WATKINS LLP cc: Aaron R. Reyes, Executive Vice President…
Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc. · filed 2026-04-22 · 0001193125-26-170529
SEC staff comment
4. Under the caption "Third Quarter Fiscal Year 2026 Highlights," for the non-GAAP measure Adjusted EBITDA, please present the most directly comparable GAAP measure of net income with equal or greater prominence. Refer to Question 102.10(a) of the Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations on Non-GAAP Financial Measures.
The company responded
The Company confirms that it will present the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure with equal or greater prominence when presenting non-GAAP financial measures beginning with its press release announcing financial results for its fourth quarter and fiscal year ending March 29, 2026. Accordingly, to the extent future Company disclosure includes a presentation of Adjusted EBITDA, net income will be presented with equal or greater prominence. Please contact me at +1 (612) 331-6910 should there be any questions or additional comments with respect to the above responses. Yours truly, HAWKINS, INC. By: /s/ Jeffrey P. Oldenkamp Jeffrey P. Oldenkamp Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer cc: Patrick H. Hawkins, Chief Executive Officer and President Dan Louismet, Interim General Counsel and Secretary Steven C. Kennedy, Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP Joshua L. Colburn,…
HAWKINS INC · filed 2026-03-13 · 0000046250-26-000009
SEC staff comment
2. Please quantify the components included in your tax specific adjustments and tell us your purpose for including these adjustments in your non-GAAP measure presentation. Please explain why these adjustments do not substitute individually tailored recognition and measurement methods for those of GAAP. Refer to Question 100.04 of the Non-GAAP Financial Measures Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations. The Company acknowledges the Staff’s comment and set forth below is a discussion of the Company’s purpose for including the tax specific adjustments in our non-GAAP measure presentation. In the future, the Company will quantify the significant components of tax specific adjustments that have multiple components to the extent material to the adjustment, as illustrated at the end of this response for fiscal years ended December 29, 2024 (“fiscal 2024”) and December 31, 2023 (“fiscal 2023”)…
The company responded
In response to the Staff’s comment, the Company intends to include disclosure in its future applicable filings to include both the quantification and business reasons of the material changes in each Segment’s Adjusted EBIT for the periods presented in addition to the discussion of the material changes in each segment’s Adjusted EBITDA for such periods that is currently presented. The Company will also include quantification and the business reasons for material changes in periods in Total Corporate Expenses within Adjusted EBIT and Adjusted EBITDA.
Krispy Kreme, Inc. · filed 2026-02-18 · 0001857154-26-000010
SEC staff comment
4. Your segment adjusted EBITDA amounts appear to be non-GAAP measures. Please revise to provide the disclosures required in Item 10(e) of Regulation S-K for each segment non-GAAP measure.
The company responded
In response to the Staff’s comment, the Company intends to include in its future applicable filings the disclosures required by Item 10(e) of Regulation S-K for each segment’s Adjusted EBITDA, including a reconciliation provided to Adjusted EBIT which is the measure presented in conformity with Accounting Standards Codification 280 required to be disclosed in accordance with GAAP. Consolidated Financial Statements Note 19 - Segment Reporting, page 104
Krispy Kreme, Inc. · filed 2026-02-18 · 0001857154-26-000010
SEC staff comment
1. Please revise your disclosures in future filings to further discuss the reasons why you believe that presentation of these non-GAAP financial measures provide useful information to investors and describe each of the adjusting items. Refer to paragraph (e)(1)(i)(C) of Item 10 of Regulation S-K.
The company responded
The Company respectfully acknowledges the Staff’s comment. In future filings, the Company will revise its disclosures to further discuss the reasons why it believes that presentation of its non-GAAP financial measures provides useful information to investors and will describe each of the adjusting items in accordance with paragraph (e)(1)(i)(C) of Item 10 of Regulation S-K. The Company’s revised disclosure will read as follows: “Non-GAAP Financial Measures As a supplement to our financial measures presented in accordance with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”), the Company presents certain adjusted (non-GAAP) measures of financial performance. These non-GAAP financial measures are not intended to be considered in isolation from, as a substitute for, or as more important than, the financial information prepared and presented in accordance with GAAP. In addition, these…
HOULIHAN LOKEY, INC. · filed 2026-02-13 · 0001193125-26-051783
SEC staff comment
2. We note the adjustments for “acquisition related compensation and benefits” in each of your non-GAAP measures appear to include deferred retention payments related to certain acquisitions. Please tell us and quantify the components comprising each of this adjustment for each period presented and clarify whether these payments are settled in cash and require continued employment. As part of your response, please explain how you determined that these were not normal, recurring, cash operating expenses of your business. Refer to Question 100.01 of the non-GAAP C&DIs.
The company responded
The Company respectfully acknowledges the Staff’s comment and has considered the guidance set forth in Question 100.01 of the Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations related to non-GAAP measures (“ C&DI 100.01 ”). The Company believes that making adjustments to exclude acquisition related compensation and benefits is appropriate and consistent with the guidance provided in C&DI 100.01 and further believes that such adjustments enhance the clarity and usefulness of the Company’s non-GAAP financial measures for its investors. Nature of the Company’s Acquisition Strategy As a professional services firm, the Company operates in a people-focused industry and is differentiated from its public peers in that it regularly uses acquisitions, in addition to organic hiring, as a way to grow its business. In executing acquisitions, the Company determines an overall purchase price (the “ Purchase…
HOULIHAN LOKEY, INC. · filed 2026-02-13 · 0001193125-26-051783
SEC staff comment
1. Please reconcile Adjusted Diluted EPS, a non-GAAP financial measure presented here and under Summary of Financial Performance, to its most directly comparable GAAP measure. Refer to Item 100(a) of Regulation G.
The company responded
We respectfully acknowledge the Staff’s comment and we advise that in future annual reports to security holders, we will include a table that reconciles any non-GAAP financial measure to its most directly comparable GAAP measure, including any reconciliations required in our Annual Report to Security Holders for Fiscal Year Ended February 1, 2026. By way of example, the following is a reconciliation of Adjusted Diluted EPS that was included in our earnings release furnished as part of the Current Report on Form 8-K, dated March 11, 2025. DULUTH HOLDINGS INC. Reconciliation of Net Loss to Adjusted Net Loss and Adjusted Net Loss to Adjusted EPS (Unaudited) Three Months Ended Twelve Months Ended February 2, 2025 February 2, 2025 (in thousands, except per share amounts) Amount Per share Amount Per share Net loss attributable to controlling interest $ (5,586 ) $ (0.17 ) $ (43,671 ) $ (1.31 )…
DULUTH HOLDINGS INC. · filed 2026-02-03 · 0001193125-26-035643
SEC staff comment
2. We note your non-GAAP adjustment labeled “tax valuation allowance” reflected in your Adjusted Net Income reconciliation. Please tell us what the adjustment represents, the reasons for excluding the changes in your tax valuation from the measure and why management believes the adjustment is meaningful and appropriate. In addition, please tell us how the adjustment is consistent with Questions 100.01 and 102.11 of the Non-GAAP Financial Measures Compliance & Disclosure Interpretations.
The company responded
The “tax valuation allowance” adjustment represents a discrete, non-cash charge recorded to establish a valuation allowance against deferred tax assets. We record net deferred tax assets to the extent we believe these assets will more likely than not be realized. A valuation allowance is established if it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred income tax asset will not be realized. The Company considers this a discrete adjustment rather than a reflection of the Company’s ongoing performance. It also does not preclude our business from utilizing the underlying tax credits for which the valuation allowance was established. Management believes excluding this discrete tax item is meaningful because it allows investors to evaluate the Company’s core results on a basis consistent with prior periods and provides better visibility into the underlying tax rate…
DULUTH HOLDINGS INC. · filed 2026-02-03 · 0001193125-26-035643
SEC staff comment
1. We note that you present a discussion of non-GAAP measures prior to your discussion of GAAP results. Please revise to present the discussion and analysis of your GAAP measures with equal or greater prominence than your non-GAAP discussion. Refer to Item 10(e)(1)(i)(A) of Regulation S-K and the guidance in Question 102.10(a) of the Non- GAAP Financial Measures Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations.
The company responded
In response to this comment, commencing with our FY 2026 Form 10-K, we will move the sections entitled “Adjusted EBITDA” and “Non-GAAP net income,” which include a discussion of non-GAAP financial measures, from their current location to a new section to be captioned “Non-GAAP financial measures” that follows the “Results of operations” section, which contains a discussion of our GAAP results, so that our discussion and analysis of our GAAP measures have equal or greater prominence than our non-GAAP discussion. Our existing section titled “Key financial and operating metrics” will accordingly be renamed “Key operating metrics” to reflect the removal of these sections, as the sections “Adjusted EBITDA” and “Non-GAAP net income” were previously presented as subcategories under this heading. 2. We note that the reconciliation of net income to non-GAAP net income includes an adjustment for…
HEALTHEQUITY, INC. · filed 2026-01-29 · 0000899140-26-000078
SEC staff comment
Comment: You make adjustments to both the numerator and denominator in your calculation of Return on Invested Capital. As it appears your calculation is not that as typically calculated, it appears you should qualify the label of the measure as “adjusted” or some other appropriate description. Also, please explain the purpose and basis for all adjustments made and disclose what the measure is intended to represent and why your measure provides useful information to investors. Lastly, present this measure calculated using the most directly comparable GAAP measures. Refer to Item 10(e)(1)(i) of Regulation S-K and the third bullet under Question 102.10(a) and by analogy to Questions 102.02 and 103.01 of the Staff's Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations on Non-GAAP Financial Measures.
The company responded
The Company acknowledges the Staff's comment and confirms that, in future filings, it will refer to this ratio as “Adjusted Return on Invested Capital” (Adjusted ROIC), and disclose what the measure is intended to represent and why the Company believes the measure provides useful information to investors. Additionally, we will explain the purpose and basis for all adjustments made in the calculation of Adjusted ROIC with footnote disclosure. We will also present the ratio using the most directly comparable GAAP measures and refer to it as “Return on Invested Capital” (ROIC). An example of the intended future disclosure of ROIC and Adjusted ROIC based on an illustrative revision of the actual disclosure in Exhibit 99.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K furnished on March 19, 2025 is presented below. Adjusted Return on Invested Capital (“Adjusted ROIC”) We believe that Adjusted ROIC is a useful…
WILLIAMS SONOMA INC · filed 2026-01-15 · 0000719955-26-000006
SEC staff comment
2. We note you reconcile adjusted EBITDA to net income, the most directly comparable GAAP measure. Your earnings release includes a table on page 1 and discussions on pages 1 and 2 of adjusted EBITDA without presenting or discussing the most directly comparable GAAP measure with equal or greater prominence. Please revise future disclosures to comply with Item 10(e)(1)(i)(A) of Regulation S-K or explain why a revision is not necessary. Refer to Questions 102.10(a) and 103.02 of the Staff’s Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations on Non-GAAP Financial Measures.
The company responded
The Company respectfully acknowledges the Staff’s comment. The Company will include the most directly comparable GAAP measure with equal or greater prominence in future filings, beginning with the Company’s Form 8-K for the 4 th quarter 2025 earnings release. If you have any questions regarding the foregoing, please do not hesitate to contact me at (773) 304-5665, or by email at ron.knutson@distributionsolutionsgroup.com. Very truly yours, /s/ Ronald J. Knutson Ronald J. Knutson Distribution Solutions Group, Inc. EVP and Chief Financial Officer cc: Richard Pufpaf Distribution Solutions Group, Inc. General Counsel Anna T. Pinedo Mayer Brown LLP
Distribution Solutions Group, Inc. · filed 2025-12-30 · 0001193125-25-336452
SEC staff comment
1. We note your disclosure of an Adjusted EBITDA measure which is calculated as the sum of the segment Adjusted EBITDA measures less unallocated corporate expenses. Please note that the total of any segment profitability measures outside the required ASC 280 disclosure in the notes to the financial statements represents a non-GAAP financial measure and should be accompanied by appropriate disclosure under Item 10(e) of Regulation S-K. In addition, the measure must comply with our guidance on Non-GAAP financial measures which includes the prohibition on excluding normal recurring operating expenses from a Non-GAAP profitability measure. See Question 100.01 of the SEC Staff’s Compliance & Disclosure Interpretations on Non-GAAP Financial Measures. Please revise accordingly. Over 40 Offices across 4 Continents Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP is part of the international legal practice Squire…
The company responded
The Company respectfully acknowledges the Staff’s comment and confirms that in future filings it will revise the table summarizing consolidated net sales and adjusted EBITDA by segment to remove the line item for “unallocated corporate expenses” and the subtotal “Adjusted EBITDA.” Please refer to Exhibit 1 for an example of the revised disclosure for the 2024 and 2023 fiscal years. Note 1. Description of the Business, Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Non-GAAP Financial Measures, page 86
FOX FACTORY HOLDING CORP · filed 2025-12-29 · 0001424929-25-000097
SEC staff comment
2. We note your disclosure in Note 1 of a Non-GAAP Financial Measure titled Total Adjusted EBITDA which appears to relate to the consolidated, or total Adjusted EBITDA measure disclosed in your segment disclosure in Note 20. Please note that presentation of a total or consolidated Adjusted EBITDA amount, other than in the reconciliation of the sum of the reportable segments Adjusted EBTIDA measures to your consolidated income before taxes, would be the presentation of a non-GAAP financial measure that is not permitted in the notes to the financial statements under Item 10(e)(ii)(C). In this regard, we note that ASC 280-10-50-28A allows for disclosure of a second segment profitability measure even if considered non-GAAP, however it must be a measure of segment profitability and not a consolidated measure. As discussed in the comment on Note 20 below, the measure of total Adjusted EBITDA…
The company responded
The Company respectfully acknowledges the Staff’s comment and confirms that in future filings it will remove from Note 1 the disclosure regarding Non-GAAP Financial Measures. Additionally, in future filings, the Company will remove the measure of total Adjusted EBITDA from the segment disclosure in Note 20. Please refer to Exhibit 2 for an example of the revised disclosure for the fiscal years ended January 3, 2025, December 29, 2023, and December 30, 2022. Note 20. Segment Information, page 112
FOX FACTORY HOLDING CORP · filed 2025-12-29 · 0001424929-25-000097
SEC staff comment
4. We note that on page 114 you disclose the other segment items for each of your three reportable segments and include a line for unallocated corporate expenses to arrive at a total for these amounts. Please note that presentation of this total is not consistent with the guidance in ASC 280 and should be removed as it represents a non-GAAP financial measure. Additionally, we note that you do not present significant segment expenses in your disclosure and instead disclose that individual expenses are not a primary focus in segment-level decision-making as the CODM relies on adjusted EBITDA as the key financial metric for assessing performance and allocating resources across segments. Please revise to include disclosure of the nature of the expense information the chief operating decision maker uses to manage operations as required by ASC 280-10-50-26C.
The company responded
The Company respectfully acknowledges the Staff’s comment and confirms that in future filings the Company will remove the line item for unallocated corporate expenses and the total for the amounts of other segment items. In addition, in future filings, the Company will revise and expand its disclosure in Note 20 to state that the chief operating decision maker reviews expenses on a consolidated basis and that no segment level expense information is regularly provided to the chief operating decision maker. The Company will also relocate from Note 1 to Note 20 its existing disclosure that describes how the chief operating decision maker uses segment Adjusted EBITDA to assess segment performance and allocate resources. Please refer to Exhibit 3 for an example of the revised table and revised disclosure. *** We hope that you will find the Company’s response to the Comment Letter…
FOX FACTORY HOLDING CORP · filed 2025-12-29 · 0001424929-25-000097
SEC staff comment
4. Please address the following as they relate to adjusted diluted net loss per share in prior comment 4: • Confirm that you will disclose prior year comparative information; • Confirm that you will disclose, at a similar level as you provided in your response letter dated September 18, 2025, the reasons why management believes that adjusting for income/loss relating to equity method securities and the gain/loss on debt securities carried at fair value in arriving at adjusted diluted net loss per share provides useful information to investors; and • Confirm that you will present the income tax effect separately from other non-GAAP adjustments as it does not appear that you have done so in your September 30, 2025 earnings release. Company
The company responded
We respectfully acknowledge the Staff’s comment. • Confirm that you will disclose prior year comparative information; We confirm that we have provided prior year comparative information related to adjusted diluted net loss per share for our most recently filed earnings release for the period ended September 30, 2025, furnished with the Commission on October 27, 2025 under Item 2.02 of our Current Report on Form 8-K (the “ Q3 2025 Earnings Release ”), and will continue to do so in future filings. • Confirm that you will disclose, at a similar level as you provided in your response letter dated September 18, 2025, the reasons why management believes that adjusting for income/loss relating to equity method securities and the gain/loss on debt securities carried at fair value in arriving at adjusted diluted net loss per share provides useful information to investors; and We respectfully…
BED BATH & BEYOND, INC. · filed 2025-12-08 · 0001130713-25-000082
SEC staff comment
4. We note that you provide services as an agent in provision of CPaaS platforms to customers and recognize the related revenue on a net basis. We further note you disclose the “gross amount of revenue from services as an agent” for each period presented. Please tell us how you considered whether your discussion of revenue on a gross basis presents a non-GAAP measure and tell us how you considered the guidance in Item 10(e)(ii)(c) of Regulation S-K and the Question 100.04 of the Non-GAAP C&DIs.
The company responded
The Company respectfully clarifies that the previously disclosed “gross amount of revenue” was intended as an operational metric. In response to the Staff’s comment, the Company respectfully undertakes to revise the relevant disclosure in its future Form 20-F filings as follows (with deletions shown in strikethrough showing the changes against the disclosure in the 2024 Form 20-F), subject to such updates and adjustments to be made in connection with any material developments of the subject matter being disclosed. “ NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS … 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES … (s) Revenue recognition … 5 CPaaS revenues The Company accounts for revenue from customers’ usage of text message and voice call services on the Company’s CPaaS platform as two separate performance obligations. The Company’s service fees are determined by applying the contractual…
Cloopen Group Holding Ltd · filed 2025-11-21 · 0001493152-25-024545
SEC staff comment
2. We understand that Fleet Complete previously accounted for bundled hardware and service offerings as a single performance obligation and recognized revenue over time. We also understand that, following your acquisition of Fleet Complete, hardware is now a separate performance obligation that is satisfied at a point in time. Please more fully address the following: ● Given the differences you noted between Canadian Accounting Standards for Private Enterprises and U.S. GAAP regarding revenue recognition, explain if and how you accounted for hardware deliveries made prior to the acquisition of Fleet Complete in your purchase price allocation and address how your valuation and accounting complied with U.S. GAAP; ● Explain if and how you are accounting for hardware deliveries made prior to the acquisition of Fleet Complete in your historical financial statements and address how your…
The company responded
The Company respectfully acknowledges the Staff’s comment and advises the Staff as follows: Accounting for Pre-Acquisition Hardware Deliveries in Purchase Price Allocation Under U.S. GAAP, consistent with ASC 606, hardware and subscription services are identified as separate performance obligations. Hardware revenue is recognized at a point in time when control of the hardware transfers to the customer, while revenue related to subscription services is recognized over time as the services are provided. Accordingly, under U.S. GAAP, hardware revenue is recognized when control is transferred to the customer, with a related contract asset, rather than deferring revenue over a period. The Company accounted for hardware sales made by Fleet Complete prior to the acquisition date in the purchase price allocation under ASC 805. Specifically, hardware deliveries made by Fleet Complete prior to…
Powerfleet, Inc. · filed 2025-10-14 · 0001493152-25-017967
SEC staff comment
7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” focuses on current year results as opposed to results from the prior year. Please see the section titled “Operations” in attached Annex A for an example of the Company’s planned disclosure. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Division of Corporation Finance Office of Finance Office of Energy & Transportation October 10, 2025 Page 3 Non-GAAP Performance Measures, page 27 7. We note your presentation of a non-GAAP financial measure titled ‘Free Cash Flow’. Please address the following: · You identify Free Cash Flow as performance measure, but the label suggests it may be a liquidity measure. Tell us the specific facts and circumstances that led you to conclude this is a performance measure. If you continue to believe Free Cash Flow is a performance measure, tell us how you determined it is…
The company responded
The Company acknowledges the Staff’s comment and respectfully advises that the Company believes that free cash flow is an important performance metric for measuring the Company’s performance for investors, and the Company does not consider this metric to be a liquidity measure. Due to the Company’s unique history, a sizable amount of the Company’s value is recorded at a zero-book basis ( i.e. , approximately 800,000 surface acres and approximately 455,000 gross royalty acres in West Texas), resulting in a low book value for the Company. Further, each of the Company’s business segments has high margins with low capital expenditure requirements, and the Company maintains a conservative capital structure with limited to no debt. As noted in Note 11, “Income Taxes” of the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements included in its Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024, the…
Texas Pacific Land Corp · filed 2025-10-10 · 0001104659-25-098757
SEC staff comment
3. We note disclosure on page 4 of your “Non-GAAP Consolidated Results of Operations” which represents a full income statement of non-GAAP measures. Please revise your future filings to remove the presentation of your full non-GAAP income statement. Refer to Question 102.10(a) of the Non-GAAP Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations for guidance.
The company responded
In response to the Staff’s comment, we will revise our future filings to remove the presentation of our full non-GAAP income statement starting with the Quarterly Financial Supplement for the quarter ended September 30, 2025 that will be included as Exhibit 99.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, and in other applicable future filings.
STIFEL FINANCIAL CORP · filed 2025-10-07 · 0001193125-25-233590
SEC staff comment
4. While you label certain groups of information as non-GAAP, we note your non-GAAP financial measures have the same line-item names as the related GAAP financial measure (e.g., net revenues, earnings per diluted common share, etc.). Please revise the description of each non-GAAP financial measure in future filings to use a different line-item name, for example, adjusted net revenues, adjusted earnings per diluted common share, etc. Refer to Question 100.05 of the Non-GAAP Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations for guidance.
The company responded
In response to the Staff’s comment, we will update our future filings to revise the description of each non-GAAP financial measure using a different line-item name, for example, adjusted net revenues, adjusted net income. adjusted earnings per diluted common share, adjusted earnings per diluted common share available to common shareholders, etc., starting with the Quarterly Financial Supplement for the quarter ended September 30, 2025 that will be included as Exhibit 99.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K, and in other applicable future filings. ***** In responding to the Staff’s comments, the Company acknowledges that it and its management are responsible for the accuracy and adequacy of their disclosures, notwithstanding any review, comments, action or absence of action by the Staff. If you have any questions or comments regarding the above information, please do not hesitate to…
STIFEL FINANCIAL CORP · filed 2025-10-07 · 0001193125-25-233590
SEC staff comment
1. On page 47 you disclose how your non-GAAP measure operating revenue is computed, with one reconciling item “subcontracted transportation and fuel.” Please consider separately showing amounts for each component therein so that investors may have an understanding of the relative impact of each. Management
The company responded
The Company acknowledges the Staff’s comment regarding the subcontracted transportation and fuel reconciling item within the non-GAAP Operating revenue measure. Beginning with the Company’s next filing of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2025, the Company will separately disclose subcontracted transportation and fuel in the reconciliation of Total revenue to Operating revenue on a consolidated and segment-level basis. For illustrative purposes, the Company has provided an example below of the disclosure that will be presented prospectively in the reconciliation of consolidated Total revenue to Operating revenue using the information from our most recent Form 10-K. 2333 Ponce de Leon Blvd., Suite 700, Coral Gables, Florida 33134 www.ryder.com September 26, 2025 Page 2 (In millions) 2024 2023 2022 Total revenue $ 12,636 $ 11,783 $ 12,011 Subcontracted…
RYDER SYSTEM INC · filed 2025-09-26 · 0001628280-25-042918
SEC staff comment
2. You reference Adjusted Operating Income and state that you recorded all-time record Adjusted Operating Income in the second quarter of 2025. We note that you do not quantify Adjusted Operating Income or include a reconciliation from a GAAP measure to this non-GAAP measure. Please either remove reference to this non-GAAP measure in future releases furnished on Forms 8-K, or advise otherwise as to why it is a meaningful and useful measure and include all of the disclosure requirements of Item 10(e) of Regulation S-K. CME
The company responded
In future filings, the Company will include all applicable disclosure requirements of Item 10(e) of Regulation S-K for non-GAAP measures used. We believe that the presentation of non-GAAP Operating Income provides important supplemental information to management and investors about financial and business trends relating to the company’s financial condition and results of operations. We propose to include the following table within our future releases on Form 8-K to quantify and provide a reconciliation for GAAP to non-GAAP Operating Income. 2 CME Group Inc. and Subsidiaries Adjusted Revenue, Operating Expense and Operating Income Reconciliation (dollars in millions, except per share amounts; shares in thousands) Quarter Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30, 2025 2024 2025 2024 Total Revenues $ XXX $ XXX $ XXX $ XXX Real estate-related costs (credits) XXX XXX XXX XXX…
CME GROUP INC. · filed 2025-09-25 · 0001156375-25-000199
SEC staff comment
2. Please remove the non-GAAP measure called loss from operating activities, adjusted for non-cash items, or provide the disclosures required by Item 10(e) of Regulation S-K. Company
The company responded
We respectfully acknowledge the Staff’s comment and advise the Staff that in future filings, we will not include the measure of “loss from operating activities, adjusted for non-cash items” within our disclosures. Rather, the Company will disclose its non-cash items separately and in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“ GAAP ”). The Company is providing the following proposed disclosure utilizing the Company’s 2024 Annual Report for illustrative purposes: The $174.3 million of net cash used by operating activities during the year ended December 31, 2024 was primarily due to loss from operating activities of $258.8 million, a favorable impact from non-cash items such as depreciation and amortization, non-cash operating lease costs, stock-based compensation, gain on sale of intangible assets, and loss from equity method securities, of $115.3 million, and cash…
BED BATH & BEYOND, INC. · filed 2025-09-18 · 0001130713-25-000066
SEC staff comment
4. Please address the following as they relate to adjusted diluted net loss per share: • Revise your description on page 8 of the adjusted diluted net loss per share calculation to include the adjustment for gain/loss on debt securities carried at fair value. • Tell us why you only present this measure for the most recent period, while you presumably utilize this measure for a period-to-period comparison. • Tell us and disclose in greater detail the reasons why management believes that adjusting for income/loss relating to equity method securities and the gain/loss on debt securities carried at fair value in arriving at adjusted diluted net loss per share provides useful information to investors. • In your Item 2.02 Form 8-K for the period ended December 31, 2023, it appears you previously had adjusted for write-downs of assets held for sale. Tell us why you do not adjust for…
The company responded
• Revise your description on page 8 of the adjusted diluted net loss per share calculation to include the adjustment for gain/loss on debt securities carried at fair value. We respectfully acknowledge the Staff’s comment. In future filings, to the extent applicable, we will revise the description to include the adjustment for gain/loss on debt securities carried at fair value as it relates to adjusted diluted net loss per share. • Tell us why you only present this measure for the most recent period, while you presumably utilize this measure for a period-to-period comparison. We respectfully acknowledge the Staff’s comment. In our earnings release for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024, furnished with the Commission on February 24, 2025 under Item 2.02 of our Current Report on Form 8-K (the “ 2024 Earnings Release ”), we presented a non-GAAP measure of adjusted diluted net loss per…
BED BATH & BEYOND, INC. · filed 2025-09-18 · 0001130713-25-000066
SEC staff comment
1. We note your response to prior comment one indicating that you will include a reconciliation of operating netback to the most directly comparable GAAP measure in future filings, although you indicate this would be net income or loss. You indicate that a gross profit measure would not accurately reflect expenses "that are integral to operating netback" while also suggesting that DD&A related to your oil and gas properties is "not directly attributable to operating costs." However, you do not explain how costs that are integral to your non-GAAP measure would be appropriately omitted from the measure, nor provide any support for the view that DD&A related to properties that are utilized in revenue generating activities would not be considered a cost of revenue. We note that your proposal reconciliation for operating netback includes ten reconciling items, while a reconciliation using…
The company responded
We acknowledge the Staff’s comment and respectfully advise the Staff that in future filings, we will include a reconciliation of operating netback to the most directly comparable GAAP measure gross profit. In our Management Discussion and Analysis (“MD&A”) reported on Form 10-Q and earnings press release for the quarter ended September 30, 2025, and in future applicable filings, we intend to extend the disclosure of consolidated and by segment gross profit in the results of operations section and provide the reconciliation of consolidated gross profit to non-GAAP measure operating netback in the non-GAAP measures section and by segment in the results of operations section. For the Staff’s reference, please see the proposed disclosures below illustrating how the Company plans to present consolidated gross profit in applicable future filings, as applied to our 2024 Form 10-K: (Thousands…
GRAN TIERRA ENERGY INC. · filed 2025-09-08 · 0001104659-25-088141
SEC staff comment
1. We note that you present, net debt to capitalization of 41.2%. Please reconcile net debt to the appropriate GAAP figure. In addition, ensure that you present for each applicable period a ratio calculated using the most directly comparable GAAP measures. See Item 10(e)(1)(i)(A) and (B) of Regulation S-K and Question 102.10 of the Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations on Non-GAAP Financial Measures.
The company responded
We acknowledge the Staff’s comment and will revise our disclosure in future filings to provide a reconciliation of net debt to the most directly comparable GAAP measure, total debt (notes payable), and net debt to capital ratio to the most directly comparable GAAP measure, debt to capital ratio. Additionally, for each period presented, we will include the comparable GAAP-based ratio to ensure alignment with Item 10(e)(1)(i)(A) and (B) of Regulation S-K and related Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations guidance. An example of our revised disclosure format is as follows: Net Debt to Capital Ratio Reconciliation The following table reconciles net debt to capital ratio (a non-GAAP financial measure) to debt to capital ratio, which is the GAAP financial measure that our management believes to be most directly comparable (dollars in thousands): Year Ended December 31, 2024 2023 Total debt…
LGI Homes, Inc. · filed 2025-09-05 · 0001580670-25-000067
SEC staff comment
80. Please provide the disclosures required in Item 10(e) of Regulation S-K if this measure is a non-GAAP financial measure.
The company responded
Average fuel margin per gallon is a non-GAAP financial measure that the Company previously disclosed in its periodic reports. Because the Company’s management does not currently believe that presentation of average fuel margin per gallon provides useful information to investors regarding the Company’s financial condition and results of operations, management has determined that it will no longer disclose average fuel margin per gallon in its periodic reports going forward. Accordingly, the Company did not include average fuel margin per gallon in the Q2 2025 10-Q. The Company calculated average fuel margin per gallon by subtracting cost of sales specific to fuel purchases and merchant fees from net sales and dividing it by the number of gallons delivered in the reporting period. The tables below provide information regarding the components and calculation of average fuel margin per…
NEXTNRG, INC. · filed 2025-09-05 · 0001641172-25-026753
SEC staff comment
7. Please refer to prior comment 3. Adjustments related to actual financial results above/(below) management’s expectations substitute an individually tailored recognition and measurement method for those of GAAP which results in a misleading non-GAAP measure that violates Rule 100(b) of Regulation G. Please remove these adjustments from your non-GAAP financial measures included in Earnings Conference Call Presentations.
The company responded
The Company acknowledges the Staff’s comment and, notwithstanding its continued belief that the calculation and presentation of Core AOI is not misleading and is useful to investors, has determined that, beginning with the release of third quarter financial results, we will no longer present Core AOI in our Earnings Conference Call Presentation. We will continue to provide investors with enhanced transparency and clarity regarding the Company’s operating results, including as compared to management’s expectations, set forth on Exhibit A hereto. * * * We appreciate the opportunity to respond to your comments. If you have any questions or require additional information, we would appreciate the opportunity to discuss these matters with you. If you wish to contact us directly, please feel free to call Brian Spitser, the Company’s Chief Disclosure Counsel, at (973) 802-7848, or me at (973)…
PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL INC · filed 2025-09-03 · 0001193125-25-194921
SEC staff comment
14. We note your response to prior comment 19 and your revised disclosure on pages 155, 161, 173 and 174. Please address the following: • Your response appears to indicate that the non-GAAP adjustments for “ Change in Fair Value of Digital Assets and Related Investments” on pages 173 and 174 include changes in fair value of the digital assets you hold directly and changes in fair value of your investment in the Domestic Solana Fund, which primarily holds Solana tokens. Enhance your disclosure on pages 173 and 174 to more fully describe and define this adjustment, so that the filing disclosures are clear and quantify the components included in this amount. • Revise your disclosures where appropriate to ensure that an investor is able to reconcile the “Change in Fair Value of Digital Assets Held and Related Investments” amounts as disclosed on pages 173-174 to the related amounts in your…
The company responded
The Company respectfully acknowledges the Staff’s comment and has revised the disclosure on pages 176 and 177 to enhance clarity and ensure that investors are able to reconcile the “Change in Fair Value of Digital Assets and Related Investments” amounts to the corresponding amounts disclosed in the footnotes. September 2, 2025 Page 8 The Company further advises the Staff that, with respect to the Domestic Solana Fund, the Company acknowledges that investors are not able to directly reconcile such amounts for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023 with the revised disclosures to Note A of the combined consolidated financial statements on page 177, as the Company did not present a summary of changes in its equity investments for those periods. Beginning with the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2025, however, the Company has included a summary of changes in its equity investments…
FT Intermediate, Inc. · filed 2025-09-02 · 0001628280-25-041444
SEC staff comment
4. Please revise to reconcile the total of the reportable segments’ amount for each measure of profit or loss to consolidated income before income taxes. Refer to ASC 280-10-50-30(b) and ASC 280-10-50-28C. The reconciliation should include a single amount for the subtotal of the reportable segments’ measures of profit or loss with a reconciliation of that amount to consolidated income before income taxes. In this regard, we note that the segment note currently includes a Corporate/Elimination column which appears to result in the presentation of non-GAAP measures of consolidated EBIT and consolidated Adjusted EBIT. Please similarly revise to reconcile to the total reportable segments’ amounts to consolidated amounts, such as the total of the reportable segments’ assets to consolidated assets. Refer to ASC 280-10-50-30.
The company responded
The Company acknowledges the Staff’s comment regarding the requirements in ASC 280-10-50-30(b) and ASC 280-10-50-28C as well as regarding the appearance of creating non-GAAP measures of consolidated EBIT and consolidated Adjusted EBIT. In future filings we will revise the presentation to remove such amounts. Additionally, the reconciliation of reportable segments’ Adjusted EBIT and Total segment Assets will be changed to include single amounts for the subtotal of segments’ Adjusted EBIT and Total segment Assets that are then reconciled to consolidated income before taxes and Total consolidated assets, respectively, as shown below in the revised Form 10-K disclosure. Further, the reconciliation of Other Segment Information will be revised to include single amounts for the subtotal of Total segment capital expenditures and Total segment depreciation and amortization that are then…
LINCOLN ELECTRIC HOLDINGS INC · filed 2025-08-22 · 0001193125-25-186356
SEC staff comment
1. We note from your response to our prior comment 1, that you will revise your segment information presentation included in the Use of Non-GAAP Information section in your quarterly earnings press releases to align with your financial reporting in the Form 10-Q and specifically, remove the presentation of net income by segment and continue to focus on Adjusted EBITDA as the key performance measure. However, we note that your disclosure on page 35 of MD&A in your Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2025, which serves as the table reconciling consolidated Adjusted EBITDA to net income attributable to Gannett, begins with the non-GAAP Adjusted EBITDA amounts, rather than the GAAP amount of net income. Please note that to avoid giving undue prominence to the non-GAAP financial measures, the reconciliation should begin with the GAAP measure of net income attributable to Gannett. See…
The company responded
We will revise the table for the reconciliation of Total Adjusted EBITDA to begin with the GAAP measure of Net income attributable to Gannett, consistent with the guidance set forth in Question 102.10(b) of the Commission’s Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations for Non-GAAP Financial Measures. We will include the revised presentation in future filings, beginning with the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2025 and in future earnings releases furnished on Form 8-K, including revisions to Table 5, as applicable. * * * * * If you have any questions or comments regarding these responses or require any additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me at tgosser@gannett.com or (571) 405-0574. Very truly yours, /s/ Trisha Gosser Trisha Gosser Chief Financial Officer
Gannett Co., Inc. · filed 2025-08-21 · 0001579684-25-000068
SEC staff comment
19. We note the following disclosures quantifying the change in fair value of digital assets: • "Other expense, net" disclosure on pages 149 and 156, which states that the change in fair value of digital assets was $(10,509), $0, $13,603 and $0 for the three months ended March 31, 2025 and 2024 and the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. August 18, 2025 Page 8 • Non-GAAP disclosure on pages 167 and 168, which includes adjustments indicating that the change in fair value of digital assets was $(9,962), $0, $10,674 and $0 for the three months ended March 31, 2025 and 2024 and the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. • Investments footnote disclosure on pages F-25 and F-75, which states that the change in fair value of digital assets held as collateral and held for sale was $(20,442), $0, $7,910 and $215 for the three months ended March 31, 2025 and 2024…
The company responded
The Company respectfully acknowledges the Staff’s comment and has revised the disclosure on pages 155 and 161 to align with the financial statements. The Company further advises the Staff that Non-GAAP disclosures on pages 172 and 173 to include the changes in fair value of the digital assets it holds directly as well as its ratable investment in the Domestic Solana Fund which primarily holds Solana tokens. Combined Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, page F-57
FT Intermediate, Inc. · filed 2025-08-18 · 0001628280-25-040674
SEC staff comment
1. We note that your disclosures of the non-GAAP Operating Netback measures include the table on page 38 which, while reflecting its compilation and composition, does not address the reconciliation requirement in Item 10(e)(1)(i)(A) of Regulation S-K, as sales alone/unburdened by any costs would not be the most comparable. Please expand your disclosures to include a reconciliation from the most directly comparable GAAP measure to the non-GAAP measure which, considering its composition and characterization as a performance measure, would be gross profit in our view, reflecting all costs that would ordinarily be attributable to sales in accordance with GAAP, and consistent with Rule 5-03.2 of Regulation S-X. For example, please ensure that gross profit measures utilized in your reconciliations reflect the amounts of DD&A that are attributable to cost of sales under GAAP. Please submit the…
The company responded
We acknowledge the Staff’s comment and respectfully advise the Staff that in future filings, we will include a reconciliation of operating netback to the most directly comparable GAAP measure. Generally, issuers in the oil and gas industry do not present gross profit measure because the expenses reflected in gross profit do not accurately reflect the expenses customary to oil and gas industry operations that are integral to operating netback. Further, our operating costs do not include any depletion, depreciation and accretion expenses as those are not directly attributable to operating costs, but rather, due to the nature of oil and gas industry, reflect the amortization of assets associated with the development of our oil and gas properties and accretion of asset retirement obligation. In our view, operating netback is more directly comparable to net income (loss) as the closest…
GRAN TIERRA ENERGY INC. · filed 2025-08-08 · 0001104659-25-075695
SEC staff comment
2. Please clarify for us if any contracts are based on a fixed fee or similar (e.g., based on square footage managed or occupied), such that pass through costs have implied profit margins. To the extent you determine that there is an implied profit margin, please explain to us how you considered Question 100.04 of the Compliance & Disclosure Interpretation on Non-GAAP Financial Measures in determining the appropriateness of this adjustment throughout your Form 10-K and in your earnings release.
The company responded
In the Company’s response to the Staff’s comment regarding the presentation of pass-through costs also recognized as revenue to arrive at Non-GAAP net revenue on May 27, 2025, the Company noted that a portion of the Company’s Facilities Management (“FM”) and Project Management contracts include a margin on pass-through costs. However, the margin earned on these contracts in 2024 was immaterial, representing 0.2% of gross revenue and 0.5% of pass-through costs also recognized as revenue, respectively. The estimated margin was based on explicit fees contractually earned on pass-through costs. Although the explicit margin on pass-through costs is not material to the Company’s gross revenue or pass-through costs, the Company considered if there is an implicit margin on any of its pass-through costs given the various contract structures for the fees earned. For example, the Company in the…
CBRE GROUP, INC. · filed 2025-08-07 · 0001193125-25-175218
SEC staff comment
1. To avoid giving undue prominence to non-GAAP measures, please revise to move your discussion of non-GAAP information so that it follows the discussion of GAAP results of operations. Refer to Item 10(e)(1)(i)(A) of Regulation S-K and the guidance in Non-GAAP Compliance and Disclosure Interpretation Question 102.10(a). Company
The company responded
The Company acknowledges the Staff’s comment and will revise the Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations section in future filings to ensure that discussion of non-GAAP financial information follows the discussion of the Company’s GAAP Results of Operations. This change will be reflected beginning with the Q2 2025 Form 10-Q. 1 Consolidated Financial Statements (18) Segment Information and Information about Geographic Areas, page 91
Rapid7, Inc. · filed 2025-08-05 · 0001560327-25-000043
SEC staff comment
3. The adjustment that excludes step-up depreciation of property, plant and equipment associated with prior acquisitions for continuing operations results in the presentation of non-GAAP measures which reflect part, but not all, of an accounting concept. As such, the resulting non-GAAP measures substitute individually tailored recognition and measurement methods. Please revise your non-GAAP measures to remove this adjustment in future filings. Refer to Question 100.04 of the Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations for Non-GAAP Financial Measures.
The company responded
We acknowledge the Staff’s comment and respectfully advise the Staff that we will revise our non-GAAP measures in future filings, including prior periods presented, to remove the adjustment that excludes step-up depreciation of property, plant and equipment associated with prior acquisitions. * * * * We appreciate the opportunity to respond to your comment. If you have any questions with respect to this letter or if you require additional information, please feel free to contact me directly at 972-740-2989. Sincerely, /s/ Richard Heppenstall Richard Heppenstall Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of ZimVie Inc. cc: Heather Kidwell, ZimVie Inc. 2
ZimVie Inc. · filed 2025-08-05 · 0000950170-25-103053
SEC staff comment
1. We note from your response to our prior comment 2, that Adjusted EBITDA is the single measure of segment profit or loss used by your CODM to assess performance and allocate resources across your reportable segments. We also note that you will remove your presentation of net income by segment beginning with your next Form 10-Q. Please tell us whether you also intend to revise your presentation of segment information included in the Use of Non-GAAP Information section of your quarterly earnings press releases.
The company responded
We will revise our segment information presentation included in the Use of Non-GAAP Information section in our quarterly earnings press releases to align with our financial reporting in the Form 10-Q. Specifically, we will remove the presentation of net income by segment and continue to focus on Adjusted EBITDA as the key performance measure, consistent with our internal reporting and the CODM's evaluation of segment results.
Gannett Co., Inc. · filed 2025-07-30 · 0001579684-25-000058
SEC staff comment
2. Please confirm that you will include directly in future Item 2.02 Forms 8-K all of the disclosures required by Item 10(e)(1)(i) of Regulation S-K for each non-GAAP measure presented, regardless of whether a non-GAAP measure is also presented in a Form 10-K or Form 10-Q. Refer to Instruction 2 to Item 2.02 of Form 8-K and Question 102.10(a) of the Non-GAAP Financial Measures Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations.
The company responded
We hereby confirm that we will include directly in future Item 2.02 Forms 8-K all of the disclosures required by Item 10(e)(1)(i) of Regulation S-K for each non-GAAP measure presented, regardless of whether a non-GAAP measure is also presented in a Form 10-K or Form 10-Q. Thank you for the opportunity to respond to your comment. If you have additional questions or comments, please contact the undersigned at kcwong@asiafingroup.com or +60 123733783. Very truly yours, /s/ Kai Cheong Wong Kai Cheong Wong Chief Executive Officer
ASIAFIN HOLDINGS CORP. · filed 2025-07-28 · 0001641172-25-021132
SEC staff comment
2. Please expand the footnote disclosures you provide for the adjustments made to US GAAP measures to arrive at non-GAAP measures to discuss all material components and to quantify each component. For example, footnote 1 for the restructuring and other cost reduction initiatives includes employee termination benefits and professional fees; and footnote 7 includes the tax effects of the adjustments and for management expectations without additional explanation.
The company responded
We acknowledge the Staff’s comment and respectfully advise the Staff that in future filings, we will expand the footnotes to our non-GAAP measure adjustments to quantify each material component when there are multiple components in the adjustment. Set forth below is an illustrative example of how we intend to expand our disclosures in future filings, utilizing footnote 1 as an example. [1] Restructuring activities to better position the organization and the expenses incurred were primarily related to employee termination benefits ($5.5 million and $2.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively) and professional fees ($0.2 million and $1.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively). 2 Additionally, we will clarify in future filings that our non-GAAP adjustment item entitled “Tax effect of above adjustments & other” represents the…
ZimVie Inc. · filed 2025-07-24 · 0000950170-25-098355
SEC staff comment
3. We note the other charges adjustment used to calculate multiple non-GAAP performance measures for inventory write-offs related to restructurings and the step-up amortization of property, plant and equipment. Please address the following: • Quantify the components of the adjustment for each period presented. • With reference to ASC 420-10-S99-3, tell us your consideration of the guidance in Question 100.01 of the Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations for Non-GAAP Financial Measures for the inventory write-offs portion of the adjustment. • Tell us your consideration of the guidance in Question 100.04 of the Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations for Non-GAAP Financial Measures for the step-up amortization of property, plant and equipment portion of the adjustment reflecting part, but not all, of an accounting concept. 3
The company responded
We acknowledge the Staff’s comment and respectfully advise the Staff of the following: • As discussed in our response to Comment No. 2 above, in future filings, we will expand our footnotes to our non-GAAP adjustments to quantify each material component when there are multiple components of the adjustment. • “Other charges” in the referenced filing reflected only step-up amortization of property, plant and equipment from prior acquisitions for continuing operations. The reference to “inventory write-offs resulting from restructuring activities” was language used in prior periods for discontinued operations and was inadvertently still included within the description. As a result, no inventory write-offs for continuing operations were classified or included as “restructuring” or “other charges” in the non-GAAP adjustments in the periods presented. • We have reviewed the referenced…
ZimVie Inc. · filed 2025-07-24 · 0000950170-25-098355
SEC staff comment
4. We note that the acquisition, integration, divestiture and related adjustment includes $2.4 million for professional services fees related to the evaluation of strategic alternatives for your portfolio. Please provide us with an explanation of the nature of these professional fees along with your consideration of the guidance in Question 100.01 of the Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations for Non-GAAP Financial Measures. 4
The company responded
We acknowledge the Staff’s comment and respectfully advise that we have reviewed the referenced guidance (Question 100.01 of the Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations for Non-GAAP Financial Measures) with regard to the exclusion of certain professional services in the adjustment of certain non-GAAP financial measures. Professional services fees incurred in connection with exploring potential transactions are outside the normal operations of a company. We do not consider professional services fees related to the evaluation of strategic alternatives for our portfolio to reflect normal operating expenses that are necessary to operate the Company’s business.
ZimVie Inc. · filed 2025-07-24 · 0000950170-25-098355
SEC staff comment
1. We refer to your graphic presentation of non-GAAP operating margin on page 2 and elsewhere in your filing. Please revise to also present, with equal or greater prominence, the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure. Refer to Item 10(e)(1)(i)(A) of Regulation S-K and Question 102.10(a) of the Division of Corporation Finance’s Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations on Non-GAAP Financial Measures.
The company responded
In response to the Staff’s comment, the Company has revised its disclosure in the cover art and on pages 2 and 155 of Amendment No. 1. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission July 21, 2025 Page 2 Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements Note 17. Subsequent Events (Unaudited), page F-51
Figma, Inc. · filed 2025-07-21 · 0001628280-25-035382
SEC staff comment
2. Your presentation on pages 7 and 8 gives the appearance of a full non-GAAP income statement. Please note that the presentation of a full non-GAAP income statement, or a presentation that gives the appearance of one, may place undue prominence on the non-GAAP information and give the impression that the non-GAAP income statement represents a comprehensive basis of accounting. Confirm to us that you will not present full non-GAAP consolidated income statements or their equivalents in future filings. Refer to Question 102.10(c) of the C&DI’s on Non-GAAP Financial Measures. ​
The company responded
The Company confirms that it will not present full non-GAAP consolidated income statements or their equivalents in future filings. Enclosed with this letter is an example of how the Company proposes to present the non-GAAP reconciliation tables in future filings, using the non-GAAP data from pages 7 and 8 of the referenced filing as an example. ​ We hope that we have sufficiently responded to your comments. If you have additional questions or comments, please contact me directly. ​ Best regards, ​ ​ ​ Kimberly A. Baber ​ Enclosure ​ c: Mr. Michael Cole, Chief Financial Officer (via email) ​ 27623305 ​ UFP Industries, Inc. Page 8 ​ RECONCILIATION OF NET EARNINGS TO ADJUSTED EBITDA BY SEGMENT (UNAUDITED) FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 2025/2024 ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ Quarter Period and Year to Date 2025 (In thousands) ​ Retail ​ Packaging ​ Construction ​ All Other…
UFP INDUSTRIES INC · filed 2025-07-17 · 0000912767-25-000030
SEC staff comment
3. We note your reconciliation between core adjusted operating income and the comparable GAAP measure on slides 22 and 23 in the 1Q25 Prudential Financial, Inc. Earnings Conference Call Presentation included in the Investor Relations section of your web-site. ● Please provide us a description of each adjustment after adjusted operating income before income taxes to get to core adjusted operating income before taxes clearly describing the nature of and reasons for the components being backed out and/or added in to allow us to fully understand why the resulting measure is useful for management and investors. Specifically quantify the amounts included/excluded to get to average expectations of alternative investment income, underwriting income and expected expenses and other items. ● Please tell us how you considered whether core adjusted operating income and related measures substitute…
The company responded
We acknowledge the Staff’s comment, and, as a threshold matter, believe it is important to note that core AOI is one of the primary measures we and our investors use, together with our GAAP results, to assess the profitability and future earnings potential of our business. Core AOI provides this insight by excluding the impact of items that we believe are not typically indicative of our ongoing operations or future performance and/or that can vary significantly from period to period, including seasonal items and market driven variances that are beyond our control. For these reasons, we refer to these non-recurring items – those adjustments referenced in the Staff’s comment – as “non-core,” and exclude them when calculating core AOI. With regard to the first bullet in the Staff’s comment, we have set forth below a description of each of the referenced non-core adjustments, the reasons we…
PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL INC · filed 2025-07-16 · 0001193125-25-159853
SEC staff comment
2. Your presentation of EBITDA appears to be a non-GAAP measure. Please provide the disclosures required in Item 10(e) of Regulation S-K.
The company responded
We note Item 10(e) of Regulation S-K and the disclosures required thereby regarding non-GAAP financial measures. In our press releases dated May 13, 2025 and the correction dated May 23, 2025 (together the “Press Releases”), both of which were attached as exhibits to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on June 3, 2025, we cited several financial measures relating to our financial results for the quarter ended March 31, 2025, one of which was “EBITDA”, which we acknowledge is a non-GAAP financial measure within the meaning of Item 10(e)(2) of Regulation S-K. We note that the presentation of EBITDA in the Press Releases (in compliance with Item 10(e)(1)(i) of Regulation S-K) did not give such non-GAAP financial measure any greater prominence than that given to the directly comparable financial measure or measures calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP. The…
ASIAFIN HOLDINGS CORP. · filed 2025-07-09 · 0001641172-25-018288
SEC staff comment
1. We note your proposed disclosure of preliminary estimated financial results for the three months ended June 30, 2025, and the anticipated disclosure of a low and high range for revenue, net income (loss), basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share and Non-GAAP financial measures. Please provide the following: • Revise your disclosures to provide context for the preliminary revenue and net income (loss) estimates, including qualitative and quantitative disclosure, by providing estimates for operating costs, expenses or other line items that would balance your disclosure. Presenting only revenue and net income (loss) in isolation may provide an incomplete picture of your preliminary results; • When including a range rather than a specific number, ensure the range is sufficiently narrow to be meaningful. Explain how the ranges were determined, including any management assumptions used.…
The company responded
The Company acknowledges the Staff’s comments and has revised its disclosure on pages 9-12 to provide further context for the preliminary revenue and net income (loss) estimates. The Company respectfully advises the Staff that its financial closing procedures for the three months ended June 30, 2025 are not complete and it believes these financial statements and, accordingly, specific numbers for the three months ended June 30, 2025, are not yet available and will not be available prior to the effective date of the Amendment. The Company respectfully submits that, when included in a subsequent filing, the ranges for revenue, cost of sales (excluding depreciation and amortization), operating and administrative expenses, net income (loss), basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share, and the Non-GAAP financial measures disclosed on page 10 of the Amendment will be sufficiently narrow to…
McGraw Hill, Inc. · filed 2025-07-08 · 0001628280-25-034473
SEC staff comment
2. We note your revised disclosures to include the Non-GAAP financial measures of Adjusted net income (loss) and Adjusted basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share. In the reconciliation of Adjusted income (loss) on page 21, you have excluded items categorized as “Other.” Footnote (g) identifies these items as acquisition related stock- based incentive compensation expense, gain from a real estate sale, foreign currency transaction impact and impact of earnings or charges resulting from matters you do not consider indicative of your ongoing business. It appears that a significant portion of the “Other” adjustment is attributed to “earnings or charges from matters not indicative of your ongoing business.” Please provide a detailed description of the specific nature and amounts of these “earnings or charges” for each period. Additionally, explain how you determined the appropriateness…
The company responded
The Company respectfully submits the following explanations regarding the nature of the further broken down adjustments included in “Other” and why management believes they are appropriate to include as non-recurring items in our EBITDA reconciliation. In each case, these adjustments reflect costs that are not part of our normal, ongoing operations, are non-recurring in nature, and are not expected to recur in future periods. These adjustments are consistent with Question 100.01 of the Division of Corporation Finance’s Compliance & Disclosure Interpretations on Non-GAAP Financial Measures, as they do not substitute individually tailored accounting principles and do not exclude recurring cash operating expenses necessary to operate our business. The below includes additional details included in footnote (g) “Other”. Securities and Exchange Commission July 8, 2025 Page 3 (iv)…
McGraw Hill, Inc. · filed 2025-07-08 · 0001628280-25-034473
SEC staff comment
2. Your presentation of Adjusted Net Earnings – Management View on slide 5 appears to be a non- GAAP income statement. Please note that the presentation of a non-GAAP income statement may place undue prominence on the non-GAAP information. Under Question 102.10(c) of the C&DI's on Non-GAAP Financial Measures, a non-GAAP income statement is considered to be one that is comprised of non-GAAP measures and includes all or most of the line items and subtotals found in a GAAP income statement. Please confirm to us that you will not present a non-GAAP income statement in future filings subject to Item 10(e)(1)(i) of Regulation SK.
The company responded
In response to the Staff’s comment, the Company acknowledges the Staff’s request and will remove the Adjusted Net Earnings – Management View from future filings. * * * If Staff should have any questions or comments regarding this submission or response, please feel free to contact me at (310) 442-8828. Thank you for your ongoing courtesy in this matter. Sincerely, Alan A. Lanis, Jr. Partner
F&G Annuities & Life, Inc. · filed 2025-07-07 · 0001934850-25-000036
SEC staff comment
1. We note from your response to our prior comment 1 that you will remove the “Total for reportable segments” line item from the segment adjusted EBITDA table in your MD&A as currently presented on page 34 of the Form 10-K, however you propose to include additional line items for “Corporate, eliminations and other” and “Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA” as part of that same table. Please note that we do not believe that presentation of these line items provides meaningful information, as the segment measures are presented on a different basis from the consolidated profitability measure. The “corporate, eliminations and other” line item represents a reconciling item required by ASC 280-10-50-30 to be disclosed in the footnotes to the financial statements to reconcile your segment profitability measures to consolidated income before taxes. It does not appear appropriate to present this amount…
The company responded
We acknowledge the Staff’s comment and appreciate the clarification regarding the presentation of segment profitability measures in the MD&A. In response to the Staff’s June 5, 2025 comment, we had proposed including line items for “Corporate, eliminations and other” and “Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA” within our segment Adjusted EBITDA table in the MD&A, in order to reconcile the total of segment results to the consolidated Adjusted EBITDA amounts disclosed on page 38 of the Form 10-K. Based on the Staff’s most recent comment, we understand that using terminology such as “Corporate, eliminations and other” may imply the presentation of a reconciling item consistent with ASC 280-10-50-30, which is required to appear in the footnotes to the financial statements and not within the MD&A. We also understand that including a “Corporate, eliminations and other” row could cause confusion when…
Cooper-Standard Holdings Inc. · filed 2025-07-03 · 0001320461-25-000118
SEC staff comment
Comment: We note you disclose Adjusted EBITDA within your summary bullet points. When presenting non-GAAP measures, please present the most directly comparable GAAP measure with equal or greater prominence. Refer to Item 10(e)(1)(i)(A) of Regulation S-K and Question 102.10(a) of the staff’s Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations on Non-GAAP Financial Measures. Please make similar revisions to your press releases furnished under Item 2.02 of Form 8-K when presenting your non-GAAP measures in the summary section of your releases.
The company responded
The Company respectfully acknowledges the Staff’s comment. The Company advises the Staff that in future periodic reports, as well as the Company’s press releases furnished under Item 2.02 of Form 8-K, when the Company presents a non-GAAP measure, it will present the most directly comparable GAAP measure with equal or greater prominence. The Company confirms when presenting Adjusted EBITDA, it will include a presentation of Net income with equal or greater prominence. Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements Note 22 - Reportable Segment Information, page 90 2.
SHERWIN WILLIAMS CO · filed 2025-06-30 · 0000089800-25-000103
SEC staff comment
2. Please expand your discussion and analysis pertaining to cost of revenues as necessary to clearly describe the composition and nature of items included in your costs of revenues; and include corresponding details adjacent to your revenue recognition accounting policy disclosures on pages F-14 and F-15 of the financial statements. As you appear to disclose a measure of gross margin that excludes depreciation and amortization that is related to cost of revenue, this would be considered a non-GAAP measure. If the measure is incomplete and you wish to retain the non-GAAP measure, please revise the label and add disclosures to comply with item 10(e) of Regulation SK, including presenting and discussing the most directly comparable GAAP measure, with equal or greater prominence, and including a reconciliation. Under this scenario we believe the most directly comparable GAAP measure would…
The company responded
The Company’s cost of revenue for both freight brokerage and dedicated services is entirely comprised of the costs our carriers incur and invoice us to perform the service. In the case of freight brokerage services, this reflects their total costs for hauling the customers freight from origin to destination. In the case of dedicated capacity services, this reflects having the trucks available to haul freight for the customer and costs related to any freight movements. For both services, these costs include any accessorial charges carriers may incur such as loading or unloading, drayage, stoppage, fuel surcharges, border-crossing, packing materials, etc. The Company’s depreciation and amortization costs relate to the Company’s use over time of internally developed software, computer equipment, furniture, and our internet domain name. The Company considers all such costs to be operating…
Freight Technologies, Inc. · filed 2025-06-26 · 0001641172-25-016701
SEC staff comment
1. If you present and/or discuss adjusted operating cash flow conversion and average adjusted net debt/headline EBITDA, please also present and/or discuss net cash inflow from operating activities to net profit ratio and debt to net profit ratio. Also, if you discuss the performance of non-IFRS measures/ratios (pages 64 and 66), also discuss the performance of the comparable IFRS measures/ratios. Three years (page 66) and five years (page 202) of non-IFRS measures are presented and non-IFRS reconciliations to the comparable IFRS measures are only presented for two years (pages 196 to 198). Please include non-IFRS reconciliations for each period non-IFRS measures are presented. Finally, adjusted operating cash flow, adjusted free cash flow and adjusted net cash flow should be reconciled to net cash inflow from operating activities. Refer to Question 102.10(a) of the Non-GAAP Financial…
The company responded
The Company acknowledges and appreciates the Staff’s review of its filings. We have considered the Staff’s comment and will include the enhancements suggested in your comment, as relevant, in our future local Annual Report to Security Holders. The Company, however, respectfully submits that as a foreign private issuer its local Annual Report to Security Holders is furnished to the Commission pursuant to Rule 13a-16 and 15d-16 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “ Exchange Act ”) and is not deemed to be “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or Item 10(a) of Regulation S-K. Accordingly, consistent with the Staff’s position in Financial Reporting Manual Section 8140, the requirements of Item 10(e) of Regulation S-K and interpretive guidance in Question 102.10(a) of the Non-GAAP Financial Measures Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations do not apply to the…
WPP plc · filed 2025-06-26 · 0001193125-25-149443
SEC staff comment
1. We believe the adjustment for acquired In-Process Research and Development expenses in your determination of multiple non-GAAP measures is inconsistent with Question 100.01 of the Non-GAAP Financial Measures Compliance and Disclosure Interpretation. Please confirm to us you will no longer include this adjustment in any non-GAAP financial measure presented in accordance with Item 10(e) of Regulation S-K or Regulation G. Company
The company responded
The Company confirms that it will no longer include an adjustment for acquired in-process research and development expense in any non-GAAP financial measure presented in the future. If you have any additional questions or require any further information with respect to this response, please contact the undersigned by telephone at (858) 366-6900 or by email at lvosseller@tandemdiabetes.com. Sincerely, /s/ Leigh A. Vosseller Leigh A. Vosseller Chief Financial Officer Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc. 12400 High Bluff Drive – ››› – San Diego, CA 92130 – ››› – (858) 366-6900 – ››› – tandemdiabetes.com 1
TANDEM DIABETES CARE INC · filed 2025-06-25 · 0001438133-25-000146
SEC staff comment
1. We note the measure you identify as EBITDA includes several adjustments in addition to the items specifically identified by the acronym. Please revise future filings to present all adjustments not specifically identified by the acronym below EBITDA such that those adjustments are only included in the determination of Adjusted EBITDA. Refer to Question 103.01 of the Compliance & Disclosures Interpretations on Non-GAAP Financial Measures. This comment is also applicable to your presentation of EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA in Form 6-Ks.
The company responded
The Company respectfully acknowledges the Staff’s comment and in future filings will revise its disclosure to remove EBITDA from its reconciliation of Net Income (Loss) to Adjusted EBITDA and update its definition of Adjusted EBITDA accordingly. If the Company determines to disclose EBITDA in the future, it will only present adjustments specifically identified by the acronym. Amer Sports, Inc. 149 Fifth Avenue, 9th Floor New York, NY 10010 Tel. +1 773 714-6400 www.amersports.com
Amer Sports, Inc. · filed 2025-06-20 · 0000950103-25-007645
SEC staff comment
2. We note the Purchase Price Adjustment in your determination of Adjusted Net Income (Loss) appears to result in you excluding amortization and depreciation on fair value adjustments of intangible and tangible assets from Amer Sports' acquisition in 2019. It appears to us that this adjustment results in presenting a non-IFRS financial measure that substitutes individually tailored recognition and measurement methods, given you exclude partial amortization and depreciation related to the step-up in fair value of intangible and tangible assets acquired in a business combination which essentially removes the impact of the acquisition method of accounting. Please revise future filings to remove this adjustment or more fully explain to us each component of the adjustment, how each amount was determined, and why you believe the adjustment is appropriate and complies with Question 100.04 of…
The company responded
The Company acknowledges the Staff’s comment and respectfully submits the following rationale for the Purchase Price Adjustment included in our determination of Adjusted Net Income (Loss) and certain other non-IFRS measures. This adjustment relates to amortization and depreciation arising from the step-up in fair value of intangible and tangible assets following the 2019 acquisition of Amer Sports. The specific facts and circumstances related to the Company’s acquisition history are a determining factor for understanding the components of the adjustment, how each amount was determined, and why the Company believes the adjustment is appropriate and complies with Question 100.04 of the Compliance & Disclosures Interpretations on Non-GAAP Financial Measures. In 2019, Amer Sports was acquired by an international investment consortium (the “Acquisition”). In connection with the Acquisition,…
Amer Sports, Inc. · filed 2025-06-20 · 0000950103-25-007645
SEC staff comment
1. We note your disclosure on page 34 of total segment adjusted EBITDA for the reportable segments. We also note that this amount differs from the consolidated Adjusted EBITDA disclosed on page 38 which is reconciled to your net loss. Please note that a total of segment profitability measures, when disclosed outside the notes to the financial statements, represents a non-GAAP financial measure and must be disclosed as such and be presented in accordance with our non-GAAP guidance. In this regard, it appears that this amount may exclude some normal recurring operating expenses. Please advise or revise accordingly. Refer to Question 104.04 of the SEC Staff's Compliance & Disclosure Interpretation on Non-GAAP Financial Measures.
The company responded
We acknowledge the Staff’s comment and respectfully advise that the segment Adjusted EBITDA amounts presented on page 34 of the Form 10-K reflect the segment profit measure used by our Chief Operating Decision Maker to assess performance and allocate resources, as required under ASC 280. These amounts are presented on a reportable segment basis and do not include results from non-reportable segments and certain corporate-level activity. Separately, the consolidated Adjusted EBITDA amounts disclosed on page 38 of the Form 10-K represent a company-wide non-GAAP performance measure that includes contributions from non-reportable segments and corporate-level activity not reflected in the reportable segment-level results. We acknowledge that the total of reportable segment Adjusted EBITDA differs from consolidated Adjusted EBITDA and recognize that disclosing a subtotal of segment Adjusted…
Cooper-Standard Holdings Inc. · filed 2025-06-12 · 0001320461-25-000116
SEC staff comment
3. We note you include a line item in your reconciliation for consolidated EBITDA. Please note that as this does not appear to be a segment measure of profitability, it would be considered a non-GAAP financial measure and should not be disclosed in the notes to the financial statements in accordance with Item 10(e)(1)(ii)(C). We refer you to Comment 3 in our letter to you dated May 21, 2024.
The company responded
We acknowledge the Staff’s comment and will remove both the consolidated EBITDA and consolidated Adjusted EBITDA line items from the segment note to the financial statements in future filings.
Cooper-Standard Holdings Inc. · filed 2025-06-12 · 0001320461-25-000116

Showing the 60 most recent of 1384.